Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 16
   Enlarge and print image (60K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 16
   Enlarge and print image (60K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
16 Sparrows Point outside Baltimore was established in the late 1880s largely because of easy accessibility to Cuban ore; the copper, sugar, and petroleum refining industries were established at about the same time for parallel reasons. A particularly revealing example is fertilizer production, for Baltimore was "the fertilizer capital of the nation" by the late nineteenth century. This industry used potash from Europe, guano from the West Indies and Peru, phosphate rock from the southern US, slaughter house tankage from the Midwest, and lime and fish scraps from a shifting variety of domestic and foreign sources. Finally, from very early in Baltimore's industrial development, other industries flourished in Baltimore because they produced the implements and infrastructure for national and international trade. Shipbuilding and railroad production were obvious examples of this. Less obvious was Baltimore's textile industry, which was pulled by the demand for duck cloth for sails (it became the world's leading producer of duck by the 1828 and held that position to the end of the century). Also, direct production for trade often had multiplier effects throughout the industrial economy. The production activities surrounding the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad after 1842 led the expansion of Baltimore's whole manufacturing economy in those years, and industrial stagnation resulted after 1852 when the B&O construction slumped. And shipbuilding, especially during and after 17 the World War I period, greatly strengthened steel production.l^ In fact, Baltimore's status as an important port was largely responsible for one of the most commented-upon characteristics of its industrial economy, its diversity. Table 2-1, adapted from the Second Industrial Survey of Baltimore illustrates this diversity by dividing Baltimore's industries in 1937 into 12 groups used by the U.S. Census and ranking them by value of product. As the table indicates, no single industrial group comes close to dominating the economy, and the division of total product value between the groups, especially the top three, is very similar. Hidden here, though, was a trend: iron and steel production was