Mary Jane Dowd, msa_sc5330_23_8, Image No: 52   Enlarge and print image (48K)          << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Mary Jane Dowd, msa_sc5330_23_8, Image No: 52   Enlarge and print image (48K)          << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
THE STATE IN THE MARYLAND ECONOMY, 1776-1807 235 fire). At the end of the seven-year policy period, the deposit together with a " proportional dividend of the profits," after deducting any losses, service charges, and office expenses, was to be returned to the policy holder?zo One interesting article in the charter empowered the direc- tors of the company to-invest their funds in stock of the Bank of the United States or to lend out their money on sixty-day promissory notes. Under these provisions the insurance so- - ciety might have opened a bank, as did some companies in other cities. The latter companies were chartered to do one kind of business but construed their charters liberally, e.g., the Manhattan Company of New York, a water-supply company, which soon found the banking business less troublesome and more profitable. Like the Manhattan Company, the Baltimore Equitable Society possessed a perpetual charter. But the Equit- able Society has made fire insurance its sole concern for the one hundred sixty-seven years of its existence. The only other mutual fire insurance company, " The Georgeto-,>>n Mutual Insurance Company against Fire on Houses, Goods and Furniture," chartered by the General As- sembly before 1807, soon passed out of the jurisdiction of Maryland, but it is considered here because it was created by the state of Maryland. Some of its provisions differ from those of the Baltimore Equitable Society, and these differences illus- trate that, at least in the field of mutual fire- insurance incor- porations, the Maryland legislature did not follow set patterns or models but often shaped the company in accordance with its own by-laws or articles of association, such as the Baltimore Equitable Company's Deed of Settlement. Property worth .$ 100,000 teas to be subscribed before the Georgetown Company could organize, but there was no stock, since operations were on a mutual basis. Losses were to be ==° 1 bid., and " Address to Members. centennial. Baltimore Equitable Society, 1794-1894." Maryland Collection, Enoch 1'ratt Free Library. If ever a fire loss amounted to more than the "whole stock," only a just portion of the-whole stock was to be assessed. The company worked under the seven year mutual plan for seventy years; in 1865 they began their present practice of issuing per- petual policies with no dividend in order to provide greater security for the company by creating a fund to repay large losses. This farsighted policy amply rewarded the company in 1904 when the -Baltimore Equitable society was one of the few insurance companies able to survive the Baltimore fire and pay its losses.