Mary Jane Dowd, msa_sc5330_23_8, Image No: 30   Enlarge and print image (45K)          << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Mary Jane Dowd, msa_sc5330_23_8, Image No: 30   Enlarge and print image (45K)          << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
118 MARYLAND HISTORICAL MAGAZINE in the Susquehanna close to the Maryland line. This pre- vented any improvements below Columbia, Pennsylvania, un- til 1801 when, in return for Maryland's somewhat reluctant permission to construct the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal, Pennsylvania declared the Susquehanna River a public high- way. 127 Maryland-Pennsylvania relations- were eased further in 1802 when the Maryland canal was complete enough for the gover- nors of Maryland and Pennsylvania to inspect it. The two gov- ernors agreed that the canal constituted " probably the most important national work on this side of the Atlantic . . . [and] that the great national object contemplated can never be real- ized but by the joint exertions and under the joint authorities of the two states of Pennsylvania and Maryland." -& III order to gain Pennsylvania's co-operation, Maryland was to prevail upon the Canal Company to relinquish its right to any tolls on the river bed.129 Despite these fine words between the gov- ernors, Pennsylvania's attitude remained obdurate. Canal Com- pany officials attempted to remove obstructions from Pennsyl- vania territory and were prevented from so doing by Pennsyl- vania officials acting under the 1799 act which made this ille- gal 1~° When it was found that Pennsylvania would not co-op- erate in any way, the Susquehanna stock fell from £I,000 per share to £500.131 In 1803 the canal managers announced that the route through Maryland was officially finished. It was a rough and irregular canal with many locks. Since the canal had been constructed as much for the purpose of erecting water-powered mills as for transportation, the canal tended to silt up. In time it became almost as dangerous to navigate as the river, and, because of its tolls, it was avoided in seasons when the river was navigable. In addition the engineers of the canal had made a serious mistake in cutting the canal too narrow and shallow. Since the usual boats for carrying Susqehanna prod- 137Ibid., p.33. 1121 A. Md. Gaz., Nov. 18, 1802, p. 2, Governor Mercer's Communication to the General Assembly. rse Md. Sess., 1803 c. 102 ending the company's tolls on the river bed and in- creasing its tolls on the canal. 1'o Livingood, p. 35. 1s1Ibid, p. 34.