Mary Jane Dowd, msa_sc5330_23_8, Image No: 27   Enlarge and print image (47K)          << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Mary Jane Dowd, msa_sc5330_23_8, Image No: 27   Enlarge and print image (47K)          << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
THE STATE IN THE MARYLAND ECONOMY, 1776-1807 115 ects to improve inland navigation, writes an authority on early American corporations, " called forth more corporation char- ters, more other legislative acts and more state support " in the states as a whole, than any other branch of early private enterprise."' Maryland was an early leader in this category of transportation companies. Even before the Revolution Mary- land and Virginia had discussed the improvement of the Poto- mac River. Surveys were also made in 1767-68 to find the best route for a canal connecting the Chesapeake and Delaware bays.l'2 These projects were put aside during the Revolution. However the war illustrated the necessity for good transporta- tion on a larger than local scale. Several of these projects, which were revived or begun after the war, were considered by the people of various states to be of nationwide importance.l13 Such were the hopes entertained by Marylanders, particularly Baltimoreans, for the Susque- hanna canal. Before the war Baltimore interests built roads into the Susquehanna Valley of Pennsylvania to tap the grow- ing trade of the area. Those Philadelphians who regularly controlled the government of Pennsylvania had provided little transportation between the valley and Philadelphia. They thought, however, that because of Pennsylvania's border trou- bles with Maryland, their western farmers would be forced to trade with Philadelphia, but this was not the case. Baltimore's war boom made it possible for that city to turn to internal improvements before Philadelphia could."' A commission was appointed in 1783 by the General Assembly to view the Sus- quehanna River in Maryland; if they decided that it could be cleared of obstructions and be made navigable, they were to estimate the expenses and make an accurate survey.llg At the November session of the same year, the commission reported favorably and " The Proprietors of the Susquehanna Canal " were incorporated to undertake the project. The mem- 1"- 1 bid., 11, 184. `x Ibid., 1, 111-16. " Ibid, 11, 16-17, 137. `4 James W. Livingood, The Philadelphia-Baltimore Trade Rivalry, 1780-1860 (Harrisburg, Penn., 1947), pp. 4, 16, 9. Only after 1789 did Philadelphia become interested in internal improvements and begin connecting Philadelphia and Cen- tral Pennsylvania by water and land routes. 118 Md, Sess, 1783 Apr., Resolution No. 17.