Mary Jane Dowd, msa_sc5330_23_8, Image No: 10   Enlarge and print image (48K)          << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Mary Jane Dowd, msa_sc5330_23_8, Image No: 10   Enlarge and print image (48K)          << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
98 MARYLAND HISTORICAL MAGAZINE believe that foreign mechanics should be aided at the expense of American manfacturers and artisans. Only after these Amer- icans were given bounties and other aid should encouragement be given to immigrants.- Who should promote the industry of Maryland? Most of those who suggested various methods of aiding Maryland man- ufacturing did not leave this question to chance. As has been seen, many who wrote thought that the state itself should aid the manufacturers directly or indirectly. Some writers pointed out that Maryland state aid to artisans was not new. Bounties had been given before the war to linen weavers using Mary- land flax.35 John Frederick Amelung deplored the fact that in the United States, Maryland included, " . . . to my knowl- edge, no man who has had sense and fortune enough to make any progress in Manufactures, got any public preference and encouragement whatsoever." 36 Others mentioned manufac- turers as being " as worthy of notice of the [Maryland] legisla- ture as merchants and farmers." 11 A " Friend to Agriculture and Manufacturers " complained in 1792 that in the preced- ing year several thousand skilled emigrants from Europe had gone to Pennsylvania and New Jersey because those states en- couraged manufacturing and Maryland did not.sg Those desiring state aid for manufacturers usually did not want it at the expense of manufacturers in other American states. Most said that Maryland should not discriminate against manfacturers of other states but only against those of foreign countries. Often there was a genuine feeling in the state of promoting American manufacturing as well as Maryland in- dustry during this period." However, in 1794 a " By-Slander " had a complete program which he wished " the legislature " to enact to keep Maryland e' Ibid., Mar. 5, 1794, p. 3. "Other colonial aid to shoemakers and leather workers and iron workers cited in John R. Commons and Others, History of Labour in the United States (New York, 1918) , 1, 41 and St. George L. Sioussat, Highway Legislation in Maryland and Its Influence on the Economic Development of the State (Balti- more, 1899) , p. 124. There was also much state aid to defense industries in Maryland during the Revolutionary War. sa Amelung, p. 6. 'T B. Md. Gaz., Aug. 15, 1786, p. 3, " To the Tradesmen and Manufacturers of Baltimore-Town;' signed "A Real Friend to Maryland." as A. Md. Gaz., Dec. 6, 1792, p. 2. " B. Md. Gaz., Aug. 20, 1784, p. 2, " A Plain Dealer: