|
Littlefield, Potomac Company, msa_sc_5330_23_4, Image No: 4 Enlarge and print image (31K) << PREVIOUS NEXT >> |
![]() |
||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
|
Littlefield, Potomac Company, msa_sc_5330_23_4, Image No: 4 Enlarge and print image (31K) << PREVIOUS NEXT >> |
| ABSTRACT Title of Thesis: A History of the Potomac Company and its Colonial Predecessors, 1743-18?8 Douglas R. Littlefied, Master of Arts, 1979 Thesis directed by: Richard T. Farrell Associate Professor Dr epartment of History One of the earliest routes to the American interior was the Potomac River. Although it was possible to reach the trans-Appalachian west through any number of routes from South Carolina north to New York, beginning in the colonial period, the Potomac was among the first to be promoted for agricultural, commercial, speculative, and military reasons. There were many who were willing to undertake the project of improving the Potomac, some as a civic responsibility, others for reasons of personal gain. These efforts were hampered, however, by the relative thinness of inland settlement, inter-colonial conflicts, and the lack of expertise and labor in America. When the Potomac Company was incor- porated after the Revolution, similar problems continued to exist and were exascerbated by additional complications of economic chaos and sectional conflicts unique to the young United States. These problems ultimately brought about the failure of the Potomac Company and the incor- poration of the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Company. The Potomac Company may have failed to achieve its charter goals, but the idea of using the Potomac as a transportation route was sound as the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal and BalLiiiIur~e and Ohio Railroad ultimatcly |