Virginia's Brief In Support of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
msa_sc_5330_15_2
, Image No.: 38
   Enlarge and print image (46K)          << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Virginia's Brief In Support of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
msa_sc_5330_15_2
, Image No.: 38
   Enlarge and print image (46K)          << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
in receiving, in Article I of the Compact, Virginia's pledge to disclaim the right to impose tolls or charges on vessels sailing to or from Maryland through the Capes of Chesapeake Bay.'°° Article VII, of central relevance in this case, provided: [T]he citizens of each State, respectively, shall have full property in the shores of Potowmack River adjoining their lands, with all emoluments and advantages thereunto belonging, and the privilege of making and carrying out wharves and other improvements, so as not to obstruct or injure the navigation of the river; but the right of fishing in the river shall be common to and equally enjoyed by the citizens of both States; provided, that such common right be not exercised by the citizens of the one State to the hindrance or disturbance of the fisheries on the shores of the other State; and that the citizens of neither State shall have a right to fish with nets or seines on the shores of the other.'°' Article VI provided: The river Potowmack shall be considered as a common highway, for the purpose of navigation and commerce to the citizens of Virginia, and Maryland, and of the United States, and to all other persons in amity with the said states, trading to or from Virginia or Maryland. `°'- Article VIII provided: All laws and regulations which may be necessary for the preservation of fish, or for the performance of quarantine, in the river Potowmack, or for preserving and keeping open the channel and navigation thereof, or of the river Pocomoke, within the limits of Virginia, by preventing the throwing out ballast, or giving any goo Compact of 1785, art. I, 1785-86 Md. Acts c. 1, 1785-86 Va. Acts c. XVII, reprinted in 12 Hening's Statutes at Large 50 (1823). '°' This was the language quoted by the Supreme Court, Wharton, 153 U.S. at 164. There were minor formatting, punctuation and capitalization differences between the versions of the Compact adopted by Maryland and Virginia. Compare 1785-86 Md. Acts c. I with 1785-86 Va. Acts c. XVII, reprinted in 12 Hening's Statutes at Large 50 (1823). None of those differences is material here. '°' Compact of 1785, art. VI, 1785-86 Md. Acts c. 1, 1785-86 Va. Acts c. XVII, reprinted in 12 Hening's Statutes at Large 50 (1823). 27