Virginia's Brief In Support of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
msa_sc_5330_15_2
, Image No.: 14
   Enlarge and print image (43K)          << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Virginia's Brief In Support of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
msa_sc_5330_15_2
, Image No.: 14
   Enlarge and print image (43K)          << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
in the shores of Potowmack River adjoining their lands, with all emoluments and advantages thereunto belonging, and the privilege of making and carrying out wharves and other improvements, so as not to obstruct or injure the navigation of the river; but the right of fishing in the river shall be common to and equally enjoyed by the citizens of both States . . . ." These words are simple and straightforward and can not be read to apply to anything other than the entire River. Other portions of the Compact also applied to the entire River. Had the drafters of the Compact intended to limit the rights secured by Article VII of the Compact to the tidewater portion of the River, they would have said so. The plain and obvious meaning of the words was confirmed in 1877 when the boundary controversy over the Potomac River was finally settled by binding arbitration. The resulting Black-Jenkins Award, approved by Maryland, Virginia, and Congress, established the boundary line at the low-water mark on the Virginia shore of the Potomac River, running from the Virginia-West Virginia border to the mouth of the River in the Chesapeake Bay. The arbitrators made clear, both in their award and in their accompanying opinion, that Virginia had the right to use the River and to extend improvements into the River from the Virginia shoreline beyond the low-water mark. Clause Four of the Award specifically provided that "Virginia is entitled not only to full dominion over the soil to low-water mark on the south shore of the Potomac, but has a right to such use of the river beyond the line of the low-water mark as may be necessary to the full enjoyment of her riparian ownership, without impeding the navigation or otherwise interfering with the proper use of it by Maryland, agreeably to the compact of seventeen hundred and eighty-five." (Emphasis added). Nothing in the Award limited the rights recognized in Clause Four to the tidal portion of the River. Moreover, Maryland conceded in the arbitration that Virginia's Potomac River access rights applied along the entire boundary. 3