Whealton, Maryland & Virginia Boundary Controversy, 1904,
msa_sc_5330_9_42
, Image No.: 27
   Enlarge and print image (41K)          << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Whealton, Maryland & Virginia Boundary Controversy, 1904,
msa_sc_5330_9_42
, Image No.: 27
   Enlarge and print image (41K)          << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
2; has not been altogether warranted. As to jurisdiction and navigation, the regulations were quite satisfactory. The compact locates Watkins and Smith's Points, but plainly says that the lines from either of these places "may- be doubtful," thus prophesying the altercation which did in fact arise. The main interest in the compact of iy$5 is, that it preceded the perfection of the union of the colonies into a stronger central government. The Articles of Confed- eration left too much power to the separate state govern- ments, and the inadequacy of the powers granted in those articles is shown in the causes leading to the compact. In other words, the compact has more hearing on na- tional history than on the history on the boundary dis- pute at this stage of its progress. Later, when the fish- ery rights came to be determined, we shall see that this agreement of 1785, as interpreted by the Supreme Court, decided the last point at issue in the long controversy. y INI;It'FkC'fUAI, LIrGISLA'PIOId x785-IHfO Soon after the Revolution, the gradual movement of the settlers farther westward raised the question of own- ership of land between the two branches of the Potomac. A measure of the General Assembly of Maryland, in y87, resulted in the appointment of Francis Deakins, who was directed to lay out manors and such parts of the re- serves and vacant lands lying to the westward of Fort Cumberland as he might think fit and capable of being set- tled and improved, in lots of fifty acres each." This was done, and the next year an act was passed far the distribu- tion of these lots among the soldiers who had composed the