Year of Jubilee (Hebrew)
According to the Pentateuchal legislation
contained in Leviticus, a Jubilee year is the year that follows
immediately seven successive Sabbatic years (the Sabbatic year being
the seventh year of a seven-year cycle). Accordingly, the Jubilee year
takes place at the end of seven times seven years, i.e. at the end of
every forty-nine years, or the fiftieth. Hence, the institution of
the Jubilee-year system is but an extension or the working out of the
Sabbatic-year legislation, viz. that as at the end of every six years
there succeeds a Sabbatic year, so at the end of each seven Sabbatic
years there succeeds a Jubilee year. Arguing from the analogous
Pentecostal system, it is evident that the actual year in which the
Jubilee occurs is not the last of the seventh Sabbatic cycle (i.e. the
forty-ninth year), but the year following, namely, the fiftieth.
Hence, at the end of each forty-eight years there occur two consecutive
fallow years, viz. the forty-ninth, or the Sabbatic year of the seventh
Sabbatic cycle and the fiftieth, or the Jubilee year. From the nature
and purpose of the Jubilee legislation, it is also evident that the
Jubilee Year is to be reckoned with in itself absolutely, and not in
relation to the length of time, or duration, of each particular event
or contract. So that if, for example, the year 195O is Jubilee Year,
and an Israelite became a slave in the year 1930, this slave is to be
set free not in 1980, but in 1950, which is the appointed year of
Jubilee.
The term jubilee year (Vulg. annus Jubilei, or
Jubileus) is of Hebrew origin, the etymological meaning of which is, in
all probability, "ram", which metonymically stands for "the horn of a
ram". Thus the name "the year of the blowing of the ram's
horn" exactly corresponds to "the day of the blowing of the
horn", or the "feast of the new year", and it was, like the
latter, announced to the people by the blowing of the horn. In
Ezechiel (xlvi, 17) the Jubilee Year is called "the year of release";
hence some commentators have derived the Hebrew word for "Jubilee"
from the stem which means "to emit", "to liberate". The first
derivation, however, is more acceptable.
The legislation concerning the year of Jubilee is found in Leviticus,
xxv, 8-54, and xxvii, 16-24. It contains three main enactments:
- rest of the soil;
- reversion of landed property to its original
owner, who had been driven by poverty to sell it; and
- the freeing
or manumission of those Israelites who, through poverty or otherwise,
had become the slaves of their brethren.
The first enactment (contained in Leviticus, xxv, 11-12) enjoins that
as in the case of each Sabbatic year, so in each Jubilee year the soil
is to be at rest, and that there is to be no tillage nor harvest, but
that what the land produces spontaneously and of its own accord is free
to be utilized by all Israelites, including, of course, the landlord
himself, but only for their own actual and immediate use and
maintenance, and, consequently, not to be stored by anyone for any
other time or purpose. The object of this law, as well as of the two
following, is most commendable, as by it the poor and all those who,
mainly on account of poverty, do not actually own any land, are hereby
provided for, not only for a whole year every seven years, but also in
every fiftieth year.
The second enactment, contained in Leviticus, xxv, 13-34, and xxvii,
16-24, enjoins that any owner of landed property, who, for reason of
poverty or otherwise, has been compelled to part with his land, has the
right to receive his property back free in the Jubilee year, or to
redeem it even before the Jubilee year, if either his own financial
circumstances have improved, or if his next of kin will redeem it for
him by paying back according to the price which regulated the purchase.
Hence, among the ancient Hebrews, the transfer of property was not,
properly speaking, the sale of the land but of its produce for a
certain number of years, and the price was fixed according to the
number of years which intervened between tbe year of the sale and that
of the next year of jubilee. Accordingly, the right of possession of
real estate was inalienable. Whether a landowner was ever allowed to
part permanently with his property for speculation, or for any purpose
other than poverty, is not explicitly stated, although according to
later rabbinical interpretation, this was considered as legally
unlawful. Real estate in walled towns was made an exception to this
law. An owner who had sold was permitted to redeem his property
provided he did so within a year, but not afterwards. Levitical
cities, on the other hand, as well as all the property in them, came
under the provisions of the general law, reverting back to their
original owners in the year of jubilee. Land in the suburbs of such
cities could not be disposed of, or traded with in any manner. In case
a man dedicated property to the Lord, he was permitted to redeem it,
provided he added to it one-fifth of its value as reckoned by the
number of crops it would produce before the year of Jubilee, and
provided, also, he redeemed it before that period. If not reclaimed
then or before that period it was understood to be dedicated forever.
The details of these exchanges of property probably varied at different
times. Josephus informs us that the temporary proprietor of a piece of
land made a settlement with its owner at the year of Jubilee on the
following terms: after making a statement of the value of the crops he
had obtained from the land, and of what he had expended upon it, if his
receipts exceeded the expenses, the owner got nothing; but if the
reverse was true, the latter was expected to make good the loss.
The third enactment (contained in Leviticus, xxv, 39-54) enjoins that
all those Israelites who through poverty have sold themselves as slaves
to their fellow- Israelites or to foreigners resident among them, and
who, up to the time of the Jubilee year, have neither completed their
six years of servitude, nor redeemed themselves, nor been redeemed by
their relatives, are to be set free in the Jubilee year to return with
their children to their family and to the patrimony of their fathers.
Exception, of course, is made in the case of those slaves who refuse
to become free at the expiration of the appointed six years' servitude.
In this case they are allowed to become slaves forever and, in order
to indicate their consent to this, they are required to submit to the
boring of their ears (Ex., xxi, 6). This exeption, of course, is in no
way in contradiction with the Jubilee-year's enactment. It is not
necessary, therefore, in order to explain this apparent contradiction,
to maintain that the two legislations belong to two distinct periods,
or, still less, to maintain that the two Iegislations are conflicting,
as some modern critics have maintained. It is important, however, to
remark that the legislation concerning the various enactments of the
Jubilee year contained in Leviticus, is not sufficiently expanded so
as to cover all possible hypotheses and cases. This want has been more
or less consistently remedied by later Talmudic and rabbinical
enactments and legislations.
The design of the Jubilee year is that those of the people
of God who, through poverty or other adverse circumstances, had
forfeited their personal liberty or property to their fellow brethren,
should have their debts forgiven by their co-religionists every half
century, on the great day of atonement, and be restored to their
families and inheritance as freely and fully as God on that very day
forgave the debts of his people and restored them to perfect fellowship
with himself, so that the whole community, having forgiven each other
and being forgiven by God, might return to the original order which had
been disturbed in the lapse of time, and being freed from the bondage
of one another, might unreservedly be the servants of him who is their
redeemer.
The aim of the jubilee, therefore, is to preserve unimpaired
the essential character of the theocracy, to the end that there be no
poor among the people of God (Deut. xv, 4). Hence God, who redeemed
Israel from the bondage of Egypt to be his peculiar people, and
allotted to them the promised land, will not suffer any one to usurp
his title as Lord over those whom he owns as his own. It is the idea
of grace for all the suffering children of man, bringing freedom to the
captive and rest to the weary as well as to the earth, which made the
year of jubilee the symbol of the Messianic year of grace
(Isaiah 61:2), when all the conflicts in the universe shall
be restored to their original harmony, and when not only we, who have
the first-fruits of the Spirit, but the whole creation, which groaneth
and travaileth in pain together until now, shall be restored into the
glorious liberty of the sons of God (comp. Is. lxi, 1-3; Luke, iv, 21;
Rom. viii, 18-23; Heb. iv, 9).
The importance of this institution will be apparent if it is
considered what moral and social advantages would accrue to the
community from the sacred observance of it.
- It would prevent the
accumulation of land on the part of a few to the detriment of the
community at large.
- It would render it impossible for any one to
be born to absolute poverty, since every one had his hereditary land.
- It would preclude those inequalities which are produced by extremes
of riches and poverty, and which make one man domineer over another.
- It would utterly do away with slavery.
- It would afford a
fresh opportunity to those who were reduced by adverse circumstances to
begin again their career of industry, in the patrimony which they had
temporarily forfeited.
- It would periodically rectify the
disorders which creep into the state in the course of time, preclude
the division of the people into nobles and plebeians, and preserve the
theocracy inviolate.
GABRIEL OUSSANI
Transcribed by Donald J. Boon
Dedicated to Frank and Mary Kaman, who introduced me to Catholicism
The Catholic Encyclopedia, Volume VIII
Copyright © 1910 by Robert Appleton Company
Online Edition Copyright © 1999 by Kevin Knight
Nihil Obstat, October 1, 1910. Remy Lafort, S.T.D., Censor
Imprimatur. +John Cardinal Farley, Archbishop of New York