Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 436
   Enlarge and print image (58K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 436
   Enlarge and print image (58K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
436 objectives and unifying them, was the old left-wing vision of building a national maritime federation of all marine workers.11 Indeed, the 1936-37 seamen's strike was very much a left-led strike: the vision, the strategies, the tactics, and the leadership personnel of the strike drew heavily on the Communist Party-initiated Marine Workers Industrial Union that dissolved into the ISU in early 1935. As we have seen, the MWIU was responsible for the Baltimore Seamen's Soviet of 1934. While the 100-Day Strike was an Atlantic Coast-wide strike, under the leadership of Joseph Quran and the New York-based Seamen's Defense Committee, the fact that the Baltimore strikers were often out in front of those in other ports was the direct legacy of the Baltimore Soviet. The steering committee of the Baltimore rank-and-file movement, also referred to as the Seamen's Defense Committee, initially contemplated a sit-down strike to support the West Coast strike. They decided instead on a mass walk-out around both their own and the coast-wide demands, and 800 seamen were on the picket line the first day. Within a couple of weeks 2,400 were out and 2,000 longshoremen were idled (though not striking) for lack of work; in addition, at least one sit-down strike aboard a freighter in the port did occur. ^ . :« r The reaction from the steam ship companies was predictable and harsh. They condemned the strike and refused to negotiate. Violence flared and a number of seamen were way-laid and beaten up; one strike supponer testified years later that goons and mobsters were brought in to intimidate the seamen. The reaction from the ISU and AFL leadership was also predictably harsh. Locally, BFL head, Joseph McCurdy, ever ready to red-bait militant workers, denounced the strike on its first day, claiming that the strikers were not legitimate members of the AFL and were dominated by "members of the Communist Party." James Kelly, a leader of the local ILA - itself threatened by the strikers' notion of a federation of all marine workers — immediately jumped into the fray on McCurdy's side. The