Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 427
   Enlarge and print image (66K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 427
   Enlarge and print image (66K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
427 As the years passed, no one else in the movement approached her stature, and only her close ally, Carl Murphy - Parren Mitchell (Clarence's younger brother) later remembered that Jackson and Murphy developed a brother-sister relationship — approached her power. (Juanita Jackson Mitchell later recalled that Ullie Jackson was the only one who could call Murphy, who was barely over five feet, "little man," and she would always add "but he's mighty.") In many ways, Lillie Jackson personified the Baltimore NAACP during the three and a half decades she led it. However, Lillie Jackson's religiously-motivated, dynamic, sometimes personalistic leadership had its down side. Sometime in the 1940s, Enolia McMillan found herself in increasing opposition to Lillie Jackson. In a 1976 interview with Richard Richardson, Enolia McMillan laid out her retrospective view of Jackson's leadership, a view that, while critical of Jackson, was also balanced: McMillan: Mrs. Jackson was a very dynamic leader and, as such, she usually formulated the plans herself and told you what they were. The discussion usually centered around her. It was more or less a one-way street whereby she would indicate what we would be working on next and how we proposed to do it and what she wanted us to do. It's a very efficient method, a method that the nations of the world used for many years — sort of autocratic, but things get done. Interviewer: Was there much conflict or was it the kind of leadership that in the movement transcended this - the way she managed? You were all interested in the same goal? McMillan: That's right. We concurred with her in the goals, and since she was accepting the leadership, we supported her. We'd agree with the goal 100%, and, if there was a difference of opinion regarding method, she was given the benefit of the doubt. We were willing to try her methods. They usually worked. I can only recall a few goals that didn't work out. I think the courage that she displayed and the faith that she had in the American way of life was the secret of her success, Courage and faith - and hers was an active courage. You know we have a lot of people who have courage when it comes to talking, but you give them and opportunity to act, their courage flees.