Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 411
   Enlarge and print image (63K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 411
   Enlarge and print image (63K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
411 those involved with the freedom movement that has been consulted for this study, ever even noticed that the Jewish elites who engaged in discrimination against Blacks came almost exclusively from one ethnic subdivision of the Jewish community: the German Jews. ° Finally, it is important to note that as the years have passed, the class-based interpretation of Jewish-Black conflicts in Baltimore in the 1930s, suggested at the time by Edward Lewis seems to have prevailed, in retrospect at least. Clarence Mitchell, Juanita Jackson Mitchell, and Walter Sondheim have all, in oral history interviews, made this their interpretive framework. In the case of Juanita Jackson Mitchell and Clarence Mitchell, it seems probable that this was also largely their view at the time, for the Forum leadership was far more connected to the broader range of Baltimore's social movements, especially through their experiences of late 1933 through 1935, than was the emerging older adult leadership of the NAACP in 1936.59 It is important to affirm that elements of the class-based interpretation of these ethnic conflicts was present on both sides of the debate in 1936, especially in the statements of both Rabbi Edward Israel and Lillie Jackson. This commonality probably explains why Jewish progressives and Black activists of different points of view continued to work together over the years, despite disagreements. Rabbi Israel, for instance, was a featured speaker at the 1936 national NAACP convention in Baltimore just over six months after the Forum debate, and continued for years to work with the freedom movement. And Edward Lewis continued to be a key, highly trusted leader in the Black freedom movement, and an important participant in other Baltimore social movements, until he left the city in 1942. In sum then, the continuing contradictions between segments of the Black and Jewish communities, even when they became more antagonistic because of issues like the downtown department stores, never really became explosive. These contradictions probably did not significantly weaken the social movements of Baltimore in that era,