Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 354
   Enlarge and print image (60K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 354
   Enlarge and print image (60K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
354 within little more that 18 months of the 1934 election campaign, Clarence Mitchell, Juanita Jackson, Frank Trager, and Joel Seidman had all left Baltimore. Because of the weakness of organizational ties between the Forum and the white Socialists, personal ties between leading elements in both groups were of exaggerated importance to the relationship of the groups. The exit of these key figures from the local scene, all of them to pursue, or to prepare to pursue their political activities on a more national level, necessarily indicated a weakening of the convergence process in Baltimore. But the critical weakening took place on a deeper level: with changes in the character of the social struggle locally and nationally, the organizational bases of the interracial convergence in Baltimore were changing. The predominantly local character both of the Forum and its movement, and of the PUL was being transformed as both organizations became more and more intimately involved with their respective national movements. The more the direction of each organization was determined nationally, and the more each became involved in its own specific issues and social base — the NAACP-led Black freedom movement for the Forum and the national movement of the unemployed for the PUL - the less room there was to experiment together with a broad range of common issues beyond the bounds of the distinct issue-oriented movements. In this sense, the strengthening national connections, meant the weakening of some local connections, and the reinforcement of the separateness between the various local social movements. • *• In an interview in 1973, Frank Trager recalled the growing national consciousness and connections of the PUL after its founding in early 1933: During those first two years, it became clear that there were a variety of unemployed organizations of different political complexions in the country. There were other independent unemployed leagues, some organizations that were organized by Lovestoneites or Troyskyites, and others that were organized by the Stalinist Communist Party. I remember attending what