Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 329
   Enlarge and print image (64K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 329
   Enlarge and print image (64K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
329 vigorously refuted seven of the eight charges against Ades, reminding the court repeatedly of Ades many contributions to the expansion of legal rights for the dispossessed. On only one charge, attempting to take possession of Euel Lee's body, did they admit that there might have been some errors made — and they made this admission largely for tactical reasons. As Houston later remembered it, Ades was in full agreement with this tactic. When Soper returned his decision, upholding 2 of the 8 charges and reprimanding Ades, Houston was shocked. Nonetheless, he felt the verdict was an overall victory: Ades was not disbarred, and the rights of movement attorneys to intervene in cases without prior invitation had c^ been established. J As McNeil reconstructs the ensuing events, Houston was entirely unprepared when the ILD launched an attack on him, claiming, essentially, that he sold Ades out and that he, as an NAACP official, attempted to divert the struggle of the Black masses into the capitalist courts. Stunned, he protested to the national ILD leadership, as did a number of other leading movement figures. The ILD leadership stood behind the initial accusations. Houston therefore wrote to Ades, suggesting that it would be best if Ades found other counsel to defend him from the new round of disbarment charges filed by the Baltimore City Bar Association.-*4 A few weeks later, Ades relented somewhat and admitted that Houston had provided him with a powerful defense in the U.S. District Court proceedings, stating that differences between them were tactical and that he did not question Houston's professional integrity. McNeil reports that "Houston was pleased," and offered to join the team defending Ades on the bar association charges. However, for whatever reasons, he did not again defend Ades, who was defended by an ILD team of lawyers headed by Joseph Brodsky. Nevertheless, little animosity seems to have remained between the two. Nine months later, some time after the second disbarment proceeding ended, the Liberal Club at Howard University staged a public debate over the Scottsboro case between Houston and Ades. The two found