Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 327
   Enlarge and print image (62K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 327
   Enlarge and print image (62K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
327 hypocrisy of claiming moralistically that Ades, after transporting Lee's body to New York, intended to "cause to be conducted over it a public demonstration or memorial meeting for the direct purpose of inciting race prejudice. ' Again there were months of maneuvering, during which the Supreme Bench refused to drop the charges against Ades. Finally, after a brief hearing, the court on December 8 found Ades guilty of conduct unbecoming an attorney and of inciting racial prejudice, and suspended him from practice for three months. The judicial campaign against Ades diverted the Baltimore ILD from other work, and drained its meager resources. Nevertheless, the ILD attempted to turn a bad thing into a good thing. It widely publicized the attempt to disbar Ades and included agitation around the Ades case in its other activities, such as the mass meeting the ILD called in March to protest both a ruling in the Scottsboro Boys case and the Ades disbarment proceedings. Furthermore, the ILD used the Ades defense campaign to further the struggle against segregation, as when Ades rejected the authority Baltimore City Bar Association because of its segregated character (interestingly, two months later, the prominent liberal attorney B.H. Hartogcnsis echoed Ades by writing a long open letter to the bar association arguing for the admission of Blacks and women). Also, the ILD attempted aggressively to follow up on the Euel Lee case when Ades defiantly issued statements demanding that a judge earlier involved in that case be impeached and Lee's former court appointed counsel from Salisbury be disbarred. In addition, the Communist Party attempted to capitalize on Ades' notoriety, when it nominated him to run for governor at the head of its 1934 Maryland electoral ticket. But the biggest potential gain for ILD came in the early stages of the disbarment process in late December 1933, when Charles Houston, Thurgood Marshall, and three other Black civil rights lawyers from Washington agreed to defend Ades.49 By the end of 1933, Charles Houston had already remade Howard Law