Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 303
   Enlarge and print image (62K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 303
   Enlarge and print image (62K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
303 George Armwood was the thirty-fourth victim of lynching in the United States in 1933 and the second in Maryland in less than two years. Of course, few in the Black community of Baltimore, including, undoubtedly, Donald Smith, seriously advocated counter-lynching. But the anger over the Armwood lynching, and over lynchings throughout the Southern U.S., was so great that giving vent to desires for revenge was by no means out of the mainstream. Even some normally moderate forces in the community responded with uncharacteristic severity. For example, after Armwood's death, Marse Galloway, a Black politician generally considered by activists to be compromised by his links to white machine politics, stated: We have kept quiet too long about the unjust laws and unjust treatment meted us by the other race. Cowards never win any victories or wear any crowns. We must protect ourselves as the white man protects himself. If we find it is necessary to protect ourselves with guns and the like, then let us do it wholeheartedly. Expressions of individual anger were only part of the response by African Americans in Baltimore to the Armwood murder. More significantly, a wide spectrum of forces in the Black community mobilized collectively to protest the lynching and to demand that the murderers be brought to justice. And, more than at any previous time since the Grash, progressive whites joined in these protests. The protests following the lynching of Armwood were in fact far, far larger and more inclusive than those following the lynching of Matthew Williams on the Eastern Shore in 1931, thereby providing a gauge of how far the Baltimore Black freedom movement had come in the interim. Moreover, the 1933 ami-lynching protests benefited directly from the contemporary mobilizations in the Black community in both the Buy Where You Gan Work Campaign and the Euel Lee Defense Campaign; in turn the anti-lynching response reinforced both of these campaigns. And although the emerging Black freedom movement in Baltimore had already attracted some national recognition, the national attention to and