Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 268
   Enlarge and print image (57K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 268
   Enlarge and print image (57K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
268 on its own activities within the overall framework of the PUL program, signed up new members, and (after the first year or so) collected its own dues, sending a portion to the central organization. Additionally, each local elected representatives to serve for one year on the PUL General Council of Delegates on a proportional basis.57 The General Council of Delegates was, in the words of the PUL constitution, "the Supreme law-making body of the People's Unemployment League." It was an active decision-making body, by accounts, meeting usually every other week, and at its height it numbered well over a hundred people. To administer the organization, the General Council elected an Executive Committee which included the organization's officers, the chairs of its committees, and a few others. The Executive Committee was scheduled to meet weekly and, in mid-1934, was comprised of 17 people including the six officers of the league. The function of the committees of the Executive Committee was to give guidance to the locals as they established their own activities and to coordinate the local activities with the overall organization. These committees corresponded to the major programmatic points and organizational needs of the PUL: the Adjustment Committee (for advocacy with relief agencies), the Mutual Aid Committee, the Legislative Committee, the Education Committee, the Finance Committee, and the Membership Committee. In 1935, as the PUL engaged in increasing protest activity, a Protest Committee was instituted. The dialectic between centralization and decentralization in this organizational structure was not only democratic in the sense that it allowed for a great deal of rank-and-file initiative and input to the decision making process, it was also functional for rapidly mobilizing and organizing a large number of people in a short time. Even if they had wanted to, the tiny group of Socialists behind the PUL could not have devised a despotic structure that would have effectively