Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 247
   Enlarge and print image (63K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 247
   Enlarge and print image (63K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
247 young white Socialists were highly motivated and moved by a sense of morality and ideals; Frank Trager's statement that PUL work was "our duty, so to speak, this was our social duty to do something about a very calamitous national situation," could easily have been made by Juanita Jackson Mitchell about organizing the Forum.19 Also like their Forum counterparts, the younger Socialists had valuable organizing skills and knowledge to offer, and enormous energy with which to apply these. Additionally, both the Forum activists and the PUL organizers were aroused by the mass practice of Baltimore Communists, but rejected the Communist Party as a means for organizing. Trager later recalled that PUL organizers were motivated by a desire to confront "the challenge of the Communist Party's Unemployment Councils." But unlike the Forum organizers, who were organically tied to the broader African American community including the African American section of the working class, the young Socialists were organically connected to very little and especially not to the working class. The alliance of the younger Socialists with the key older Socialists, and the ability of this alliance to utilize the matrix of connections that the Socialist Party had with several communities in Baltimore, allowed the younger PUL organizers to compensate for their own lack of organic 20 connection. As important as the Socialist Party's network of connections was to the PUL, it is important to put this organization and its influence in proper perspective. The SP was not in any sense a major social force in Baltimore and Maryland. Its gubernatorial candidates in the 1926 and 1930 elections only received 2,495 and 4,178 votes respectively, totals significantly larger than those of the Communists, but nonetheless representing only a tiny fraction of the electorate. Its May Day celebrations in 1931 and 1934, by press accounts, drew between 200 and 300 persons on each occasion, only slightly larger than the simultaneous Communist Party events. The SP only had six "struggling" ward clubs in Baltimore in 1934 and only 375 members in all of Maryland at that time.21