Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 236
   Enlarge and print image (59K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 236
   Enlarge and print image (59K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
236 picketing was legal under the Norris-LaGuardia Act, and former participants in the Baltimore boycott movement celebrated this victory as their own.^* There are two final points to be made about the boycott movement, both regarding the relationship of this movement to whites. First it is important to emphasize that this was an almost entirely Black movement which received little evident support from whites or from organizations with white memberships. The main exception to this was the interracial Baltimore unit of the Communist Party. However, the Baltimore CP's support was not unequivocal. Like the national CP, the local party was ambivalent about the boycott for fear of it dividing Black and white workers and diverting the Black freedom movement away from a struggle against the ruling class toward whites as a whole. CP member Bernard Ades, Euel Lee's lawyer, spoke at a mass rally during the second week of the Pennsylvania Avenue boycott. While extending his solidarity to the boycotters, Ades asked that the white workers in the Pennsylvania Avenue stores not be antagonized. He further proposed that the movement fight for shorter hours at full pay for all workers in the stores, thereby opening jobs for Black clerks without firing any white clerks. The Afro reported that "Although the audience applauded, many murmurs could be heard against his proposal. -> Secondly, it is important to note that the Pennsylvania Avenue phase of the boycott movement resulted in heightened ethnic conflict between the Baltimore Black freedom movement and some members of Baltimore's Jewish community. The simple reason for this is that the great majority of the white small store owners in the Northwestern Black community were Jewish. Particularly after the victory over the large chain stores, the A&P and ASCO Stores, the main target of Buy Where You Can Work movement shifted from white commercial capital (often large white commercial capital) to small Jewish capital; from the racism of white business to the racism of Jewish business. In the stories, columns, and editorials of