Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 59
   Enlarge and print image (62K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Andor D. Skotnes, The Black Freedom Movement and the Worker's Movement in Baltimore, 1930-1939, Rutger's PhD, 1991,
Image No: 59
   Enlarge and print image (62K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
59 Finally, the institutional web of the Baltimore African American community included the organizations of the Black freedom movement proper — the organizations that most directly engaged in the struggle to promote African American ethnic interests: the organizations that functioned as the main carriers of African American political culture. Alone among the ethnic communities of Baltimore, with the partial exception of the Jewish community, the Black community had the continuing capacity to generate significant social and political movement on the basis of ethnic identity and interests, and this capacity was largely crystallized in these organizations and institutions. Of course, at times when the freedom movement was expanding, more and more community forms were pulled into active and explicit participation, and broad, though short-lived coalitions appeared. At times of ebb, the movement's core institutions remained to directly articulate the traditions and to plot the strategies of struggle. Traditionally, the organizations at the center of the Black freedom movement of the era have been divided into two groupings: those concerned principally with economic struggle and betterment, and those focused on political- juridical struggle. The distinction is useful if not applied too rigidly or schematically. There is for example, a tendency among observers to assume that organizations in the economic field in these years tended toward accomodationalist positions in the tradition of Booker T. Washington, and those in the political field tended toward more combative integrationalist positions voiced by figures like W.E.B. DuBois. However, reality was far more complex. For one thing, nationalist trends in the wake of the Garvey movement had influenced all aspects of African American political culture, including the most accomodationalist and the most integrationist, often in subtle ways. Moreover, on the local level, the demands of the day-to-day activity and relatively limited local resources, resulted in far greater pragmatism and fluidity in ideology and practice than was apparent on the more