|
266
are alone, and ask yourselves the question, whether a gentleman, a
man of culture, would be likely to carry around in his pocket so
cumbersome a key as that, which he could, by no possibility, for any
honest purpose, use anywhere else? When that key is called for,
what is his answer? °' It hangs up yonder." It is not found there;
the key of his wardrobe is found. He says,-'°I do not know,
then, where it is." Then that door is broken open; and it turns out,
afterwards, that while they were at the jail, and before they had gone
to the College, that privy-key, which locked up those remains, had
been borne about in the prisoner's possession, and was taken from his
pocket by the person who arrested him.
In the great case of Courvoisier, for the murder of his master, Lord
William Russell-that case which has made all Europe ring with
strictures upon the conduct of the Counsel, whether just or unjust-the
great fact insisted upon was, that the bloody gloves were found in the
trunk of the prisoner-put there, as it was contended by his Counsel,
at a subsequent time, to fasten suspicion upon an innocent man.
Here were the remains themselves found, not in the trunk of the
lrisoner, but found in a place to which he alone had access. -the
ey of which he kept in his own pocket, and the fact of which pos-
session he denied.
And you will determine whether I have said too much, or said it
too strongly, not only that this prisoner stands justly charged with
the homicide of Dr. Parkman, but that his mutilated remains have
been found under his lock and key.
The matter of the blankets-of new blankets and counterpanes
-is inexplicable to me. Why they should have been put there, or
carried there, I do not know, and you will judge. I make no sug-
gestion respecting them.
Now, what was his conduct and his whereabouts through that
week? In the first place, he was locked into his laboratory, at
unusual times, during a week of official leisure. Has he shown, or
attempted to show, that he was engaged in anything which required
his presence there ? That he was so locked in, does not depend on
Littlefield's testimony alone. Clapp, Rice, Starkweather, Fuller,
Mrs. Littlefield, Mr. Samuel Parkman Blake, Mr. Sawin, who had
often gone there before, testify to it.
The Cochituate water was running. No fires were wanted; and
yet, it is here in evidence, unimpeached and unimpeachable, that fires
were kept up during that week, more intense than were ever kept
there before, and in places where no fire was ever kept before.
Gentlemen, when was he there ? I have already stated to you,
and to the Court, that, upon a critical examination of the testimony
of his three daughters, there is a most significant and remarkable
corroboration of the testimony of Littlefield. They do not conflict in
any particular. He was there on Friday afternoon. What was he
doing there ? Where did he dine ? I have already asked you that
question. It is worthy of your consideration. On Saturday morning,
you have no trace of him. From Saturday morning at one o'clock,
until Saturday in the afternoon at one o'clock-have you any assurance
where he was during that interval ? Is not the argument just and'fair,
that he had come over, in one of those flittings of his, from Cambridge
to the Medical College? Nobody else had a key to the building but
|
