Dr. James W. Stone. Report of the Trial of
Professor John W. Webster ...
, 1850
,
Image No: 216
   Enlarge and print image (54K)           << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Dr. James W. Stone. Report of the Trial of
Professor John W. Webster ...
, 1850
,
Image No: 216
   Enlarge and print image (54K)           << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
207 Now, Gentlemen of the Jury, these remains were not found, any of them on Monday or Tuesday. On Tuesday, remember, the testi- mony of Mr. Kingsley was, that he saw a fire burning in this furnace -a bright fire burning there. But there is no pretence, I think, that then the head, or the arms, or the limbs, of any human being, were in that furnace. There is no such pretence as that. If there was a bright fire burning, it was seen; and if human flesh or bones were burning, they would have been noticed. On Wednesday, it was said that there was a great fire burning in the furnace. But Littlefield saw none. Yet he did see Websrer carrying the materials. For what purpose we do not know. But this we do know,-watched or not watched, Dr. Webster left early on that day, and did not return till Friday morning. In the mean time, the room was open to whomsoever might go there. And if there was a person disposing of some of these remains by putting them under the privy, finding the fire left by Prof. Webster in the morning, might he not have conceived the idea of burning a portion of the remains there, and so thf, whole be accomplished? Now I have said that these were mysterious circumstances. Prob- ably Dr. Parkman wandered round the city, and finally went, in the evening, to the College. But there is a mystery beyond. There is one mystery concerning what is found. The remains found are those alone of the naked dead body of a.human being. Where are the remnants or the traces of the garments ? In this furnace, mark, so accurate and so exact was the examination of the chemists, that they were enabled to detect a quantity of tea-chest lead. It is in the report which has been read to you. So exact and minute was one examination as that. Where is anything, or the remains of anything, but the naked dead body of a human being? And yet, Gentlemen, it is certain that Dr. Parkman wore garments from head to foot, and had a coat, and under-clothes, and boots. And there undoubtedly was, as there is about all of us, something of an incombustible character-the buckles of our suspenders, some- times the buttons on our coats, and the nails in our shoes. Some- where orother,whyhavenotremnants,orspecimens of the remains of these, been found? Now, I put it to you, if when in that College you find nothing but the remnants of a naked bumaq being,-if you know that Dr. Park- man had garments upon his person, if you find that there is a proba- bility that he may have been, in aberration of mind, wandering in dif- ferent places-I submit to you if it is an extravagant, visionary theory, that he w;is stripped elsewhere, that his garments never were in that College; that he was taken in there a naked body, and treated as he was treated till danger was thought to come, and then his body was disposed of. You are the judges; but upon these facts, these proba- bilities, these circumstances, you must pass. They cannot. be dis- guised; then cannot be discarded. And if they make doubts for the Government's case, if they leave you, with all their accumulation of proofs, in a state that you cannot say, with positive assurance, I am convinced, beyond reasonable doubt that every other reasonable theory is, to a moral certaintv, excluded,-then our innocence may not be manifest, but our salvation from conviction is, under the laws of the land, made certain to us.