Hall account of Webster case, 1850,
Image No: 9
   Enlarge and print image (48K)           << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Hall account of Webster case, 1850,
Image No: 9
   Enlarge and print image (48K)           << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
9 cessories of clime, as the thought instantaneously flashed on his logical mind,-what fearful evidences ! It was urged by the prosecution that the remains were found in Dr. Webster's custody; but was not Littlefield keeper of the prem- ises ? It was urged that Dr. Webster had had a week to consum- mate his bloody work ; but who was the most in the building and haunting the-laboratory passages with singular fascination ? It was urged that Dr. Webster was constantly making pointed en- quiries as to the disappearance ; was not Littlefield doing the same thing ; was not the latter fretted and irritated from his own account by the questions hourly put him on the subject; was he not found an hour or two after his Sunday interview with Dr. Webster, talk- ing of the disappearance to the toll man and some bystanders at the bridge office, and carefully repeating the admission Prof. Webster had made as to the interview ? It was urged that Dr. Webster went into hysterics one evening ; was not Littlefield in a round of suspi- cious excitement, curiously associated with merry-makings, for a whole week? It was urged that Webster, on his trial, was anxious and troubled in physiognomy ; was that worse than the flippant oratorical manner of Littlefield, who was on the stand swearing away the life of a seven-year employer, solicitous to inform the jury that Webster had never given him a cent-worth gratuity, (although it was well known that Webster's generosity was prejudicial to his interest,) and endeavoring to be humorous ? Remember in all these statements we are pursuing an hypothesis, which we have a right to do in pursuance of the rule of law, which was acknowledged by the Judge and the Attorney-General, but strangely disregarded, that the matters of circumstantial evidence must approach direct testimony and lead to no other rational hy- pothesis than the guilt of the accused. Much stress has been laid upon the conduct of Dr. Webster. We consider that his conduct offers, from first to last, striking evidence in his favor. He is at home on the fatal Friday, by bi-, domestic board, calm and easy. He mingles in the social amenities of life, (pleasanter than which exist in few places out of Cambridge,) with his usual hilarity. He retires to his couch-breakfasts with his family-is absent a few hours before his dinner-returns at one o'clock to dinner -remains at home the entire afternoon-reads from a book to his family in the evening-attends the college chapel in the morning- remarks to his household that he must go ;to Boston and visit Dr. Parkman's family, because he has observed enquiries after the icn-