|
iv PREFACE.
It may serve to give a further idea of the probable interest of the present
volume to the reader, to state that it contains at least a quarter part
more evidence, in compass, given at the jury-trial, than any other report
in print. Much of this additional evidence will be found under the heads
of the testimony of some of the most important witnesses at the trial,
particularly Dr. Keep, Prof. Wyman, Mr. Littlefield, and Mr. Clapp.
Besides the opportunity which the undersigned has enjoyed for a
personal knowledge of most of the matters which he undertakes to report,
he has been favored with the manuscript-notes of the Judges and of the
other counsel In the cause, and has had access to the original papers and
sources of proof produced at the jury-trial. His Honor, the Chief Jus-
tice, also favored him with his charge to the jury, now for the first time
written out and revised with care for this publication. In reference to
a statement in the preface of Messrs. Phillips, Sampson & Co.'s phono-
graphic report of the jury-trial, that the Chief Justice had "carefully
corrected" his charge for that report, it is proper to say, that when called
upon to revise it after it was in print, and preparatory to its being imme-
diately stereotyped, he attempted to correct only some of the most obvious
errors it contained, in the imperfect manner in which it was then prac-
ticable so to do.
In reference to the arguments of his associates on the jury-trial, the
undersigned would say, that those gentlemen have done him the favor
to revise them for the present volume; two of them never having
attempted that undertaking with reference to any other report, and the
Attorney General having only partially, and in a very imperfect m~nnor,
performed that office with reference to a portion of his address to the jury
as reported in the phonographic publication just referred to.
In preparing the work, the undersigned has derived much assistance
from the contemporaneous reports of the Boston and New York daily
newspapers, and also from the phonographic report of Dr. Stone, just
alluded to, which, however, it is understood, did not profess to report,
in that method, much if any of the evidence, but to be confined mainly
to the charge of the Chief Justice, the arguments of counsel, and some of
the interlocutory discussions. These contemporaneous reports have occa-
sionally afforded valuable aid in presenting more literally the phrase-
ology used by witnesses or speakers than that which the undersigned
found upon his own manuscript-minutes or those to which he had re-
course. But it is probably no unjust disparagement of these temporary
y transcripts of proceedings,-prepared as they were for daily publication
without an opportunity for revision, and when the reporters, at their dis-
|
