Bemis Report of the Webster Trial, 1850 [1897], Image No: 327   Enlarge and print image (69K)           << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Bemis Report of the Webster Trial, 1850 [1897], Image No: 327   Enlarge and print image (69K)           << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
TRIAL OF JOHN W. WEBSTER. 327 3. If the Court should be of opinion that the record does show an adjudication that the indictment should be entered in the Supreme Judicial Court on a particular and fixed day, yet the record of this Court shows that the indictment was not so entered on such day. 4. It does not appear from anything before the Court, that the defendant was ever served with legal process, notifying him that the indictment would be entered in the Supreme Judicial Court, and of the day of such entry. The first class of errors go to the jurisdiction of the Court. The Supreme Judicial Court have no longer original jurisdiction over indictments for capital offences. Since the statute of 1844, chap. 44, § 4, all such indictments in the County of Suffolk are made return- able, in the first instance, to the Municipal Court; and whatever juris- diction attaches to the Supreme Judicial Court, only vests at a subse- quent period, and upon compliance with certain preliminary formalities. By the statute just cited, § 4:- "If the grand jury, attending at any term of the Municipal Court, shall find and return to the Court any indictment for any crime punish- able with death, if the person accused be not in custody, process shall be forthwith issued for the arrest of the party charged with such offence, and the party so charged shall, as soon as may be, be served with a, copy of the indictment by the sheriff, or his deputy, with an order of court giving notice to the accused that the indictment will be entered at the Supreme Judicial Court, next to be holden in and for said County of Suffolk, or at any intermediate time before the next term, when said Supreme Judicial Court shall be in session in said county, and notice of such indictment shall also be forthwith given to the chief or first justice of that Court, by the clerk of said Municipal Court; and the said clerk shall transmit and certify the original indictment to the Supreme Judicial Court, at the next term thereof, or at any intermediate time when said Supreme Judicial Court shall be in session in said county, where it shall be entered, and the said Supreme Judicial Court shall then and there have full cognizance and jurisdiction thereof, and the same proceedings shall be had, as if the said indictment had been found and returned in said Supreme Judicial Court." Now, by this statute, certain preliminary proceedings are first to be had in the Municipal Court, in relation to a transfer,-first of the indict- ment; and secondly, of the custody of the person of the accused: and it is only upon a compliance with these, that this Court shall have as "full cognizance and jurisdiction thereof," as if the indictment "had been found and returned in said Supreme Judicial Court." We shall submit, that thus much at least should appear to have been done by the Municipal Court:-an adjudication that the indictment shall be entered in this Court; and an adjudication that it shall be so entered on a certain fixed day before the next term thereof, (if, as was the case in the present instance, this Court should be in session at the time of finding the indictment.) Furthermore, this Court can only know of these preliminary proceedings by a record; and the record of the Munici- pal Court should also show that the defendant had been legally notified, by proper process, of the time and fact of such entry. All that was before this Court, at the arraignment and at the trial, was the original indictment, with the certificate thereon of the clerk of the Municipal Court which has been read, as it appears on the record of this Court. The whole of this certificate, excepting so much thereof as certifies the identity of the indictment, is a mere nullity. The clerk is not a certifying officer, except so, far as the law gives him express authority to certify. The record itself, or an exemplification of it, is the only source from which this Court can judicially know that the Municipal Court has taken the proper course to confer jurisdiction upon it under the statute. A clerk's certificate is worthless for this pur- pose.