Bemis Report of the Webster Trial, 1850 [1897], Image No: 266   Enlarge and print image (69K)           << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Bemis Report of the Webster Trial, 1850 [1897], Image No: 266   Enlarge and print image (69K)           << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
266 TRIAL OF JOHN W. WEBSTER. ful phrase "he bursted out a-crying." The counsel suggests, that, as Mr. Littlefield was the janitor of that College, he was therefore familiar with subjects of dissection. True Gentlemen; but even he, familiar as he was with them when that which had been but first a vague suspicion in his own mind had gradually, through that week, wrought itself into the minds of othersi till he had been compelled through fear of what might happen to the College to go into that vault,-when that suspicion ripened into the certainty that the remains of Dr. Parkman were there,- that a generous patron of the College had been foully murdered, and his eye at length rested upon his mutilated and dishonored body, concealed under its basement,-even he could not choose but weep! Did this expression of feeling proceed from a hardened conspirator, who was seek- ing in that vault for what he knew he should find? But what opportunity had Littlefield to be in any way concerned in this matter? He was in Dr. Holmes's lecture-room within five minutes, probably, of the time when Dr. Parkman entered that building. Chief Justice.-Did he not go into Professor Ware's room? Attorney General.-Yes, Your Honor. But he went to Dr. Holmes's room before the close of the lecture. He assisted him in what he had to do, after his lecture was finished. He then came down with Dr. Holmes, at a quarter-past two o'clock. Now, Gentlemen, we cannot ask Dr. Holmes the question, whether that statement is true because Littlefield having stated it, and being unimpeached, could not be corroborated; but the prisoner's counsel had it in their power to contradict him if the statement were untrue. Then Littlefield, according to his own testimony, made his prepara- tions for the fires in the furnaces of the medical lecture-room and the dissecting-room, and also prepared the stove in Dr. Ware's private room; and, at three o'clock, Dr. Bosworth called there, and found him engaged in these accustomed occupations, and in his ordinary dress. Thus we have Littlefield, at five minutes before two, at a quarter-past two, at three o'clock; and then at four o'clock, he was lying down, as we prove by his wife's niece, Miss Buzzell when Mr. Pettee calls, and testifies that he saw him. Again between half-past five and six o'clock, he dresses himself and goes to Mr. Grant's dancing academy, and is there that whole evening. With a single further suggestion I leave this matter. If Mr. Little- field had anything to do with that body, you will remember that he had access to the dissecting-room vault. His throwing anything down into it would not have excited the suspicions of any person who might be passing through the entry. He also understood the lock upon the lid; and if he had those remains there for any other purpose than for the gross and incredible purpose which .I have already discussed,-of fasten- ing suspicion upon Dr. Webster,-he could and would have deposited them in that vault, beyond all doubt. The question is asked, Why did not Dr. Webster, supposing him to be the guilty party, deposit the remains in the dissecting-vault? Two sat- isfactory reasons suggest themselves why he did not. It is very doubtful whether he knew where the key was kept, or whether he could have unlocked it if hp did. When you visited the building, Gentlemen, you tried that lock, and ascertained for yourselves how difficult it was to unlock it. The other reason is, that he was exposed, while there, at any moment, to observation from he students, who were passing, day and night, to and from the dissecting-room. But all these possible alternatives of what he might have done sug- gest another consideration; and it answers a large portion of the counsel's argument, about the folly of the prisoner, if he was really guilty. When you are tracing the history of a criminal, when you are attempting to mark out the course which he has pursued, you must remember, that, in judging of his actions and in weighing his conduct, your own honest hearts can furnish you with no criterion of comparison. You cannot put