Bemis Report of the Webster Trial, 1850 [1897], Image No: 252   Enlarge and print image (70K)           << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Bemis Report of the Webster Trial, 1850 [1897], Image No: 252   Enlarge and print image (70K)           << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
252 TRIAL OF JOHN W. WEBSTER. Now, if Dr. Parkman were roaming about this city, as these witnesses describe, during the whole of that Friday afternoon, I ask you to say, upon your consciences, would it not have been possible to have produced here, to swear to the fact,-not six, or sixty, or six hundred, even; six thousand, rather? Do you suppose that he could have wandered about this city during a whole afternoon, and no human being, except these six persons, see him? Well, what is the evidence? Why, that this great number of persons, who, if he had been in the streets, must have seen him, did not see him! This is shown by the search which followed immediately; a search of the greatest possible extent, vigilance, and scrutiny. But it is not merely the passing a person on the opposite side of the street, or on the same side of the street, or having a casual glance at him, that can give us a well-grounded assurance that we are not mistaken in this matter of identity, if we attach any weight to experience. We offered to put in evidence here, that there were persons who accosted a man, believing him to be Dr. George Parkman, and found they were mistaken when they approached to converse with him. We were not allowed to put it in. And why? Because, as the Court said, it was a matter of common experience. And I put to you, that it is a matter of common experience,- common to you and to me. I ask you, how many times you have gone up to a person and spoken to him, or even attempted to take him by the hand, and then retreated with- "I beg your pardon, sir; I thought it was Mr. You may have seen my friend, Mr. Train, the District Attorney of the neighboring County of Middlesex, by my side, during one day of this trial, In the last capital trial I conducted with him in that county, I met upon the sidewalk, near the Leverett-street Jail, on my way to East Cambridge, on the first morning of the trial, a police-officer of this city. As I passed him, he said to me, "Mr. Train, good morning." I stopped, having this very matter of the disappearance of Dr. Parkman in my mind, and turned towards him. He asked, "At what time shall I bring over the subpoenas?" "In what case?" I inquired. "The Pearson case," said he. "Oh, at any time in the forenoon," I responded, and passed on. On my arrival at the Court-room, I mentioned the circumstance to Mr. Train; and at my suggestion, he met the officer with a reproach when he came with the subpoenas, for not bringing them sooner. "Why," said the officer, "you told me I could bring them any time this forenoon." "I told you?-when?" "Why, this morning, when you were coming over." "I have not seen you to-day," replied Mr. Train. "Why, certainly, I met you, and talked with you." "You met me?" "Certainly, I did." So confident was he of the identity, that he was ready to have gone upon the stand and sworn that he actually talked with Mr. Train; and when I told him that I was the person, and told him precisely what the conversation was, for a long time honestly believed that we were playing a hoax upon him. Yet, Gentlemen, the degree of resemblance between Mr. Train and myself is no greater than is found between many persons here present, and between Dr. Parkman and many persons now living. I alluded, in the discussion of as question that was mooted to the Court yesterday, to the celebrated case of Sherman, in Middlesex. That was an instructive case, upon this matter of identity. A person was arrested, charged with having committed an assault upon a little girl in Medford, and another upon another girl in Newton. One assault was committed on Saturday, and the other on Monday. A week afterwards a man made his appearance in Newton, and was recognized by two ladies as the person who had committed the assault, and who had been seen by them running away from the spot where it was committed. He was arrested and brought before a magistrate. He stated that he had never been in that place before which was untrue. The children were sent for, and in a crowd of a hundred people they both selected him. The parties from Medford came over, and they identified him also. He was indicted