Bemis Report of the Webster Trial, 1850 [1897], Image No: 195   Enlarge and print image (72K)           << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Bemis Report of the Webster Trial, 1850 [1897], Image No: 195   Enlarge and print image (72K)           << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
7 RIAL OF JOHN W. WEBSTER. 195 general conformity to the person of Dr. Parkman. They testify that his form and structure were somewhat peculiar, and that similar peculi- arities were observable in these remains; and that, in all the particu- lars of form, structure, size, height, color of the hair, unusual growth of hair upon the back, they discovered a general correspondence to him. and that in no particular whatever did they find any dissimil- arity. This testimony, which, in most of the circumstances mentioned by the medical gentlemen, is similar to that of other witnesses who were the friends or personal acquaintances of Dr. Parkman, may be admitted to have some tendency to prove, and perhaps to create a strong probability, that they were the remains of his person. But, however strong the probability, the sufficiency of the evidence, if it stoppkd here, to establish the identity, may well be questioned. The testimony of Dr. Keep and Dr. Noble is more precisely to the point of identity, and may perhaps be regarded by you even as conclu- sive. Dr. Keep declares that he has not a particle of doubt, that the parts of the blocks of mineral teeth which were taken from the fur- nace were of his manufacture, and were made for Dr. Parkman. He states the various considerations which have induced this unhesitating conviction in his own mind; and he has exposed and explained to you his models, and exhibited to you how, and in what manner and particu- lars, the teeth which were taken from the furnace will conform to and correspond with them. The testimony of Dr. Noble entirely corresponds with that of Dr. Keep; who is sustained very fully, in certain particulars, by the testimony and opinions of Drs. Harwood, Tucker, and Codman We. have called, in the defence, Dr. Morton, an intelligent and skilful dentist, whose opinion, in some particulars, varies from that of Dr. Keep; but whether there is any real or ,substantial contradiction between them, or whether it really affects his testimony in any import- ant particular, can probably be determined Without much difficulty by those who had an onnortunity of hearing the explanations and state- ments of the several witnesses. Having thus barely adverted to the sources and character of the evidence, upon which the identity of the remains with the person of Dr. Parkman is attempted to be proved, it is not my purpose to argue or discuss it; but to leave the question as to the death of Dr. Parkman to your decision, without any additional remark. If the fact of his death is not established, there can be no occasion for further inquiry. But, if the death of Dr. Parkman shall be determined by you to be an established fact, the Government are bound next to proceed and show, that it was occasioned by violence, or the unlawful agency of some other person. Here is required your careful and serious atten- tion. Is it proved, beyond all reasonable doubt, that other than natural causes must necessarily have interposed to terminate his life? I shall not now ask your attention to any of the parts of the testimony of the Government, by which they attempt to implicate Dr. Webster, as the perpetrator of the crime charged against him, but shall endeavor first to see, whether there is sufficient proof of the fact, that a crime has been committed; whether any personal violence, or unlawful agency of another person, was the cause of the death of Dr. Parkman. Two circumstances have been mentioned, and will he relied on„ to satisfy you that the death of Dr. Parkman was produced by violence; by the infliction of blows with dangerous weapons, upon his person. I refer to the supposed fracture of the skull, and the perforation, or hole, found in the side of the body. And I shall 'endeavor to satisfy you. that there is no evidence relative to eithe of these. which can safely a.nd necessarily lead you to any such Jhision. ~ Indeed, they may very easily and readily be disposed of. As to the supposed fracture of the skull, the whole sugP-estion rests upon the narrowest and most insufficient -round. Dr. Wyman has Pxhibited a portion of the skull-bone, which. upon its edges. affords