Bemis Report of the Webster Trial, 1850 [1897], Image No: 189   Enlarge and print image (71K)           << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Bemis Report of the Webster Trial, 1850 [1897], Image No: 189   Enlarge and print image (71K)           << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
TRIAL of JOHN W. WEBSTER. Mr. Thompson says, that he came into Boston, from Cambridge, on the afternoon of Friday, the 23d of November; and that, at twenty minutes after two o'clock, he met Dr. Parkman in Causeway street. He is enabled to fix the day by the circumstance, that he came into Boston to deliver to the person for whom the service was rendered, a memorandum of an examination he had made in the Registry of Deeds for the county of Middlesex into the title to a certain parcel of real estate. He did deliver it, and at the same time gave a receipt for his services, which bears date the 23d day of November; and that day was the only time, for a week before or a week after, when Mr. Thompson was in the city. He left Cambridge at near two o'clock, observing the hour of his leaving, as it was indicated by two public clocks in that place; and soon after he met Dr. Parkman, he had occasion also to refer for the time, to his own watch. Thus he most definitely- fixed the day, and the hour of the day, of their meeting in Causeway street; and this time was so long after Dr. Parkman undoubtedly entered the Medical College, that it is certain that he must have left it, if he was actually seen by Mr. Thompson. Why should not Mr. Thompson be belived by you? He was well acquainted with Dr. Parkman. He had known him by sight for ten years; and, during the last five years, had frequently transacted busi- ness with him in the office of the Register of Deeds for the county of Middlesex. He had ample opportunity to take notice; and he says that his observation was clear and distinct, and that hits recollection of the circumstance is full and complete. No attempt is made by the Govern- ment to impeach the character of Mr. Thompson. I supposed, indeed, from the cross-examination, conducted by the Attorney General, with a written memorandum held in his hand, said to be signed by the witness, that there might be an attempt to show that he had made, on other occasions, statements differing from those to which he testified here. But his explanations appear to have been perfectly satisfactory, both as to the origin and contents of the paper; for the Attorney General has not seen fit to exhibit it to you for your inspection. Nor is there any reason disclosed, in another part of his cross- examination, which should affect his credibility. He entertains, it seems, some peculiar opinions. He believes in biology, and supposes himself capable of being put into what is called the biological state. In all this he may be right, or he may be wrong; it is mere matter of theory and opinion. We know that doctrines in religion, and theories in philosophy, which seem to us to be strange, fantastical, and absurd, are often adopted by men who are sincere and ardent seekers and lovers of the truth. It is perhaps most rare that such novelties are adopted by men who are not honest in their belief. They who go against the cur- rent of opinion, and the fashion of the times, do so. not to secure public favor, but because the sincerity of their opinions constrains them to forego or disregard it. And yet, no better reason than this can be assigned, why full credit should not be awarded to Mr. Thompson; a reason, I am sure. which you cannot deem sufficient to justify the neglect or the discarding of his testimony. If it be relied upon, it establishes the vital part of our defence. Mr. Wentworth, a gentleman well known in this city, and whose personal appearance upon the stand certainly entitles him to your most favorable consideration, testifies that. in the afternoon of this same Friday, between the hours of half-after two and half-after three. he met Dr. Parkman in Court, at the head of Sudbury street; that they were coming towards each other, from opposite, directions; that, just before they met, the witness crossed to the opposite side of the street, and at that, moment took notice of Dr. Parkman, and of his peculiar manper. as if he were looking over the tops of the buildings; all which he particularly described to you. He was himself walking with Mr. Russell, whose attention he drew, by some observation. to the appear-