Bemis Report of the Webster Trial, 1850 [1897], Image No: 181   Enlarge and print image (66K)           << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Bemis Report of the Webster Trial, 1850 [1897], Image No: 181   Enlarge and print image (66K)           << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
TRIAL OF JOHN W. WHBSTER, 181 shal Tukey was to have a body of men there to search for Dr. Parkman. When we arrived at the toll-house, Mr. Littlefield paid the toll. The toll-man was there, and an old gentleman, sitting back in the house, and perhaps, another person; I did not know the old gentleman. Mr. Littlefield asked the toll-man if the policemen had been along over; and he replied, that there had been some by, but that they had gone back, again. I then asked the toll-man, if he was the person who saw Dr. Parkman pass over, in company with an Irishman; and he replied that he was not; but that it was the young man who had gone to tea. The toll-man then went on to say, what the young man had said about it. Mr. Littlefield remarked, that he was concerned, or employed, at the College; and one of us spoke of the report, that Dr. Webster had paid Dr. Parkman money. Mr. Littlefield then said that he saw Dr. Parkman coming towards the College, Friday afternoon: and that is all that I recollect of his saying, about Dr. Parkman. I don't know whether it was he, or, I, that mentioned the report about Dr. Webster's paying the money; nor, whether Mr. Littlefield had previously seen Dr. Webster, that afternoon, or not. Cross-examined, by Mr. Sohier.-We were all close together, when this conversation occurred; Mr. Littlefield and I were standing, looking in, at the toll-house window. I did not hear Mr. Littlefield say, that he saw Dr. Parkman come out of the College. I mean to swear that he did not say it. I recollect every word that he said.. I called it to mind, the next morning; and may have thought of it, a half a dozen times since. I have talked to Mr. Littlefield about it, since the trial began. I met him in the street, before Mr. Green testified, and he asked me if I recollected going over to Cambridge bridge, and what was said at the toll-house. I told him that I did recollect it; and had some talk with him about it. Yesterday, he told me that he thought that I should be summoned. I have not talked with Andrews about nay testimony, nor with Mr. Littlefield in Gibbs's eating-house. Isaac H. Russell, sworn,-examined by Mr. Bemis. I reside in this city; am a dry-goods dealer, of the firm of Jacobs & Co. I know Mr. Samuel A. Wentworth, who keeps a provision-store in Lynde street. I have no recollection of walking with him, or being in his company, on Friday, Nov. 23d. I think that I have been in his company, once, when he pointed out Dr. Parkman to me; but I don't recollect how shortly it was before his disappearance.. It might have been one day, or it might have been three months before then. If it had been that day, I think that I should have recollected it. I heard of Dr. Parkman's disappearance, shortly after it occurred. I can't tell the day, but I saw advertisements in the newspapers about Dr. Park- man, and didn't then recollect having seen him. To the Chief Justice.-I have no recollection of the place where I was with Mr. Wentworth, when we saw Dr. Parkman. Cross-examined by Mr. Sohier.-I know Mr. Wentworth and some- times walk with him. I have no doubt that I should have remembered the fact of seeing Dr. Parkman, if it had occurred about the time of his disappearance. I don't recollect when, where, or how, I first heard of his disappearance. [The Attorney General now rose and stated to the Court, that there were some four or five witnesses who had been summoned on the part of the Government, whom he wished to call. to show that there was a person about the streets of Boston, at the time of Dr. Parkman's dis- appearance, who bore a strong resemblance to him, in form, gait, and manner; so strong, that he was approached and spoken to, for him, by persons -well acquainted with Dr. Parkman. Mr. Merrick. on the part of the defence, objected to the evidence, as unusual in its character, and as amounting to nothing more, than that the witnesses were persons