Bemis Report of the Webster Trial, 1850 [1897], Image No: 160   Enlarge and print image (61K)           << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Bemis Report of the Webster Trial, 1850 [1897], Image No: 160   Enlarge and print image (61K)           << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
160 TRIAL Or' JOHN W. WEBSTER. to the College. I did not know that he lectured at Cambridge, to the undergraduates, in summer time. To the Chief Justice.-When I wanted to see him, I usually went at one o'clock. Robert I:. Apthorp, sworn,-examined by Mr. Sohier. I reside in Boston; resided in Cambridge, from 1842 to 1845. I know Professor Webster, and have known him, some six years. During my residence at Cambridge I was quite intimate with him, and was well acquainted with hi$ family and the society in which he moved. I never heard any- thing to the prejudice of his character, as a quiet and peaceable man, while I lived in 'his neighborhood. No cross-examination. Samuel S. Green, sworn,--examined by Mr. Sohier. I reside in Cam- bridge; have lived there, forty years. I recollect the Sunday after Dr. Parkman's disappearance. I was the person who gave the information to the City Marshal, that Dr. Park- man had been seen to go over to Cambridge. I was at the toll-house, the evening referred to, when two men stopped in and entered into conversation. One of them was Mr. Littlefield.-At least, he said that he was the person who had charge of the Medical College. Mr. Little- field said, that he had seen Dr. Webster pay Dr. Parkman $470. I under- stood him to say, at first, that he saw the money paid; but, afterwards, that he did not actually see it. I was sitting, back, in the toll-house, when the conversation occurred; and there was a police-officer, over, against me. I understood Mr. Littlefield to say, that he saw Dr. Park- man got out of the college the Friday when the money was paid him. I noticed the discrepancy in his statements, and remarked upon it, at the time, after he went out. Cross-examined, by Mr. Bemis.-There were several persons present. Mr. Edward Whitney was one; and he understood him, as I did, at first; but I understand that he has since changed his mind. Mr. Fifield, the toll-man was there. I didn't know the police-officer; don't know the others. I cannot tell how the conversation originated, nor Mr. Little- field's exact words. He named the sum, as $480; he did not give any odd cents. Mr. Bemis.-You stated, a moment since, that it was $470. Witness.-No, I said that it was $480. Two of the jurors, simultaneously.-He said. $470. Witness.-Well, it was $480; and I made a mistake, in saying that it was $470, if I said so. I cannot recollect where he said he stood, when he saw this money paid; in what particular room. I don't recollect his saying anything about seeing Dr. Parkman come into the College. I didn't hear anything about Dr. Webster's having told Mr. Littlefield, himself, this account about Dr. Parkman's paying the money. I can't tell much about the conversation; only, that I thought he said once, that he saw him pay the money to Dr. Parkman, and then, again, that he did not. I concluded, from the whole, that he meant to be understood, that he had not seen the money paid. Samuel P. P. Fay, sworn,-examined by Mr. Sohier. I reside in Cam- bridge; have done so, some forty years. I have known the defendant, ever since he was a professor: and for the last fifteen or twenty years, I have been a near neighbor and intimate acquaintance, belonging to the same social circle with him. I have always understood his reputation toy be that of a kind, peace- able, and humane man; eminently social; by no means, a passionate, or violent one, though somewhat nervous and excitable. I should say that he had been esteemed both benevolent and humane. At least, I never heard anything to the contrary.