Bemis Report of the Webster Trial, 1850 [1897], Image No: 28   Enlarge and print image (68K)           << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Bemis Report of the Webster Trial, 1850 [1897], Image No: 28   Enlarge and print image (68K)           << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
28 TRIAL OF JOHN W. WEBSTER. directly to his brother's, the Rev. Dr. Francis Parkman, (also my brother-in-law) and informed him of the Doctor's absence, and thence to Mr. Edward Blake's ofce in Court street, my nephew, to concert. means for making inquiries for him. There was some suspicion on our minds, at first, in regard to a man who had been punished for steal- ing from the Doctor's house; and we sent to the attorney who had defended him and found that that man was away from the city, and had not been in it recently. We then went to the City Marshal's, between ten and twelve o'clock, and engaged him to have inquiries made through the police. That evening, an advertisement was inserted in the news- papers by my direction, giving notice of the Doctor's digappearance. I offered a reward subsequently, of $3,000, for information in regard to h~itn, and one of $1,000, for the discovery of his body. I do not remember the day on which they were advertised. During the whole week suc- ceeding, I was consulted, and took an active interest in the investiga- tions. I knew of the discovery of the remains, on the night of the 30th of November; have seen them since they were arranged and put together. (The Attorney General having here asked the witness, " whose body, in his opinion, the remains constituted a part of?" and objection having been made y the counsel for the defence, to the question being answered, the Court intimated that the inquiry would be proper, if put in the shape, what appearances, if any, did the witness observe, show- ing a resemblance to any person?"-antecedent to the statement of his opinion.) I saw appearances about these remains, which induced me to believe them to belong to the body of Dr. George Parkman. These were principally the color and kind of hair, on his breast and leg, which exactly corresponded with what I had seen. Tile hair upon his breast, I had seen previously; but that on his leg, I had seen in November last; not a great while before his disappearance. He came to my house early one morning,--a cold morning,-without any surtout; and to my remark, " that he wasn't dressed warm enough," he replied, that he had not on even drawers, and pulled up his pantaloons to show it. I have seen him open his breast in such a way as to show how much it was covered with hair, before. I could not identify the leg, so well from the complexion of the hair, as the breast. The form, size, and height, of the parts, corresponded to Dr. Parkman. There was nothing about them dissimilar from him. I saw the teeth which were found. I am knowing to the fact of his wearing false teeth. I finally took charge of the remains, to have them entombed, as those of Dr. Parkman, and they were so buried. As to my financial relations with Dr. Webster, so far as they were also connected with Dr. Parkman:-I received a note from the defendant, about the 18th or 19th of April, 1848, asking for a private interview. I appointed the next morning. He came and informed me of his embarrassments, and said that he expected the sheriff would seize his furniture if he. couldn't raise. a certain sum to pay off a pressing de- mand which had been long standing; -I think, a year. He then pro- posed to sell me a cabinet of minerals. I told him that I did not want them. He said that I might like to make a donation of them to some institution; that he Would sell them to me for $1,200. 1 refused; but he pressed me so hard, and worked upon my feelings so much, that I concluded to aid him. I asked him, "how much he needed?" and he said that $600 would relieve him for the present. I told him that if he could get my note discounted for that amount, at some bank which he named, I would buy his minerals. In the course of the morning, he called and said that he could get it discounted,-at the Charles River Bank,-I think; and I let him have my note, for which I took this receipt, dated April 20th. (Receipt produced.) He shortly after brought me a catalogue, and bill of sale of the minerals, which I put on file, without examining. On the 6th of June, he called on me again, and I