|
TRIAL OF JOHN AV. WEBSTER.
of the ribs put in so that the ends of the ribs had left marks upon it.
This was the left thigh. A large knife fell out of the tan; I should call
it a jack-knife. A string went round the body and leg, for the pur-
pose, as it seemed, of lashing them together. These limbs were taken
out and washed, and put with the others, and given into 'the charge of
the officers. I saw the medical gentlemen examining them, Sunday.
I was at the Medical College, Sunday afternoon, when a pair of
slippers and pantaloons, with spots of blood on them, were found by
officers Butman and Heath. Dr. C. T. Jackson was also present. Mr.
Butman found the pants in a clothes'-press, at the head of the stairs
leading to the laboratory. Dr. Jackson directed that they should be
kept carefully, in order that Dr. Wyman might examine whether they
had blood upon them; and they were wrapped up in paper, and, I think,
Mr. Butman took charge of them. A large knife, with a silver sheath
or handle, was also found by officer Heath, Sunday afternoon, when I
was present. I was also there when a saw was found, with something
on the handle looking like prints of blood; hand-saw, some twelve or
fifteen inches long.
I was present when the limbs were put together, by Dr. Lewis. I
think it was on Monday morning. The general appearance? of the body
was that of Dr. Parkman. He was tall, and very slim. I should say,
about- five feet, ten and a half inches, high. He was straight, and small
over the hips. He was light complexioned; his hair, sandy; his under
jaw was prominent. I should not like to say positively, that the parts
of the body which I saw were Dr. Parkma.n's.
(Objection was here made to a question put by Mr. Bemis, whether
the witness had ever known Dr. Parkman .to use profane language.
On the statement being made, that it was proposed to connect the testi-
m6ny with the witness's own actions, or to implicate the defendant in
an untrue statement, as would hereafter be proved, the objection was
waived.) I have heard Dr. Parkman use gevere language, but never,
a profane word; and I have seen him under circumstances calculated
to produce the greatest excitement.
I remember hearing Professor Webster remind Mr. Littlefield that
it was time, or nearly time, to ring the bell for lecture, when we were
at the Medical College, on the Tuesday's examination before the arrest.
Cross-examined by Mr. Sohier.-The morning after the arrest, I
searched Professor Webster's house at Cambridge, in company with
officers Clapp and Spurr, and officer Sanderson, of Cambridge. I made a
second search, there, about the 12th of December. We had a search-
warrant on the first occasion, but not on the second. Mr. Starkweather
was with me the last time.
Dr. Parkman would use plain language in talking with people, who,
he thought, had dealt dishonestly with him. If a man had acted knav-
ishly towards him, he wouldn't hesitate to tell him so; but I never
heard him use a profane word. I never heard him use harsh language
in asking for paymient of money, when treated with civility. I
Mr. Clapp and the other officers took up some of the minerals and
examined them out of curiosity. on the occasion of the Tuesday's visit
to Dr. Webster's apartments. The minerals were all about the vicinity
of the tea-chest; on the shelves and the boxes. I can't say whether any
were taken from the chest itself. I think Dr. Webster spoke of ringing
the bell for lecture, Tuesday, just as we were going out. I observed
the fire in the furnace before looking at the minerals; also before going
to the privy. I think that Dr. Webster stood, at the time I looked
under the grate, by 'the bench near the window, and wag talking with
Mr. Clapp.
The door of the small back private room was open, when Mr. Clapp
put his head in:-far enough open, for me to have seen the bottles on
the shelves. Professor Webster let us into the lecture-room himself,
when we knocked. Mr. Littlefield knocked. I don't know that there
was anything peculiar about the knock. I don't remember the con-
|
