Bemis Report of the Webster Trial, 1850 [1897], Image No: 14   Enlarge and print image (72K)           << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Bemis Report of the Webster Trial, 1850 [1897], Image No: 14   Enlarge and print image (72K)           << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
14 TRIAL OF JOHN W. WEBSTER. therefore, that the longest interval during the week, when his official engagements did not call him to the College, was between Friday and Tuesday. It will appear that on Friday, the 23d, he remained at the College till after candle-light; that he was seen there by more than one person as late in the day as that; that he was there on Saturday, and again on Sunday, which was unusual; that the doors of his rooms, which ordinarily had been left unfastened when he was absent from the College, were fastened; and that the key of one door, which he had kept deposited in a certain place up to that period, and to which one witness, who had occasion frequently to go to his rooms, had access, was carried away by Dr. Webster from the building; and that on Saturday, which is the cleaning-day in the College, the janitor who had charge of the rooms, went into Dr. Webster's back room, and attempted to go down into the laboratory for the purpose of cleaning, when Dr. Webster ordered him out through the lecture-room door. I have already stated that Dr. Parkman's friends, after making an anxious search for him on Saturday, had gone so far on that day as to advertise his disappearance in the evening papers. It will appear that Dr. Webster took in one of those papers, contain- ing the advertisement. It will also appear that his relations to certain members of the family of Dr. Parkman were somewhat intimate; that he had been a parishioner of the Rev. Dr. Francis Parkman, a brother of the deceased; that a short time previous to this event, the latter had visited Dr. Webster's family, to perform a pastoral office of friend- ship; and that their families had been on terms of considerable inti- macy. The first disclosure that an interview had taken place. between Dr. Webster and Dr. George Parkman,-the first intimation of that in- terview received by the family, although they had been in a state of intense anxiety from the Friday previous,-was made by Dr. Webster to Dr. Francis Parkman, about four o'clock on the afternoon of Sun- day. The manner of making that communication was such as to excite the surprise, to say the least, of Dr. Francis Parkman and his family. On the afternoon of Sunday, Dr. Webster made a similar communi- cation, differing, however, in some particulars, to several other persons, whose testimony will be laid before you. Substantially his statement was, that Dr. Parkman came to the Medical College by appointment, at half-past one o'clock on Friday, to receive payment of his debt; that he came into the lecture-room, where Dr. Webster paid him the money, stating the precise amount; that he received it and started immediately to go out, without leaving any evidence of the note having been paid, or that the mortgage was cancelled; that on Dr. Webster's reminding him of this, he turned back and dashed his pen over the signature on the note, telling Dr. Webster that he would see to the cancelling of the mortgage at Cambridge; that he then went out with the money in his hand, going up .the stairway two steps at a time; and that he (Dr. Web- ster) had no recollection of the denomination or amounts of the bills which he paid him. These statements of Dr. Webster will be shown to be inconsistent with each other. To one witness, he has stated that there were two persons present; to others, that there was no person present; to one witness, that he did not know in what money he paid him, as he took it indiscriminately from the students for their lecture-tickets; to other witnesses, that he did remember that there was a $100 bill of the New England Bank. And throughout the whole of this transaction, it has been placed by him distinctly upon the ground that he did, from the proceeds of the tickets to that course of lectures, pay to Dr. Parkman $483 64, which was the amount he stated to be due to him. We shall produce evidence that his whole statement is a fable and a pretense; that he did not pay to Dr. Parkman the money which he says he paid, but that every dollar of the money received by him from the sale of his tickets, went elsewhere. Then, Gentlemen, you will have occasion, following him through