Steiner, Suffrage, 1895,
Image No.: 35
   Enlarge and print image (74K)           << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Steiner, Suffrage, 1895,
Image No.: 35
   Enlarge and print image (74K)           << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
3e CITIZENSHIP AND SUFFRA(4E IN MARYLAND. them.' The proposition was made, that the State prevent even naturalised citizens from voting, and some attempt was made to have a definition inserted of who 'are citizens of this State.2 Great difference of opinion was also shown in regard to the question as to residence of voters.' It. was urged on the one hand, that the voter ought not only to show a residence of oil(-. year in the State and six months in the county, but that Baltimore's wards should rank, for this purpose, as counties and that the voter should live sixty, thirty, or even ton or fifteen days previous to election in the precinct in which he desired to vote. These later requirements failed to find acceptance front the majority of the Convention. By many, it was urged that even a five days' requirement would work great hardship, especially- in a population' composed largely of clay laborers, like that of Baltimore city. A touching picture was drawn of essary to make an individual competent to give an intelligent vote, by nlal:ing him familiarly acquainted with the tree interests of the county, so that he may be guided to a wise selection of a, candidate. Another stated,' he favored the requirement of six months' residence in the county, not so much for the reason above given, as that the voter may have identity of feeling and inter- est with the community which he purposes to aid in electing a fnn<•tinnary, and also that he ma.y become sufficiently known to the people of the vioina