Steiner, Suffrage, 1895,
Image No.: 10
   Enlarge and print image (73K)           << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Steiner, Suffrage, 1895,
Image No.: 10
   Enlarge and print image (73K)           << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
CITIZEN SHIP AND SUFFRAGE IN MARYLAND. 11 obtained all Original -Grant from the Proprietary, and so holds nothing by descent from ' leis father; but is, to all intents and purposes, one of tile natural-born people of this Province and hath as much security for his lands as any other person in this Province now hath, or the Rt. Honble, the Lord Propry call grant." This would seem to decide, definitely, that persons born in the territory of Maryland with either parent of English race, were citizens from their birth. The rule did not hold for those born in Alaryland, both of whose' parents were foreigners, for in 1671, persons born in Marvland of foreign par- ents were thought proper subjects of naturalization and, in 1674, children of a denizen were naturalized, though born in Maryland since their father's deni- zation. The most of tlfose naturalized were Hollanders ; there being thirty-two born in Holland and naturalized before 1654, in addition to eip-ht born in America of Dutch parents.' A large part. of the fourteen whose parentage is not stated were, apparently, Dutchmen. French candidates follow next in number, there being tNventy-two of that race naturalized. Swedes come third, as there were fourteen of them made citizens of Maryland. The most of tile Dutch and Swedes probably came from Delaware after the English took pos- session of it. Other. nationalities are found but seldom-there were three Germans, one Portugese, one Spaniard, one Dane and one from the Spanish Netherlands. The Lel;ishlture= was careful not to grant privileges of citizen- ship to any but genuine residents and rejected one candidate, because lie `. was master of a ship, not inhabiting in the country, nor having any lands or estate here." There-was, evidently, no disposition to grant the privilege of naturalization to any but bona fide settlers, though no particular antecedent period of residence seems to have been considered necessary. Naturalization continued to be granted by special Act until the end of the Provincial exist- ence of Marvland. Bacon' enumerates one hundred and seventy Acts for the naturalization of persons named therein. As many of these acts were for the -benefit of more than one person, it is probable that from two hundred and fifty to three hundred persons were thus naturalized. After 17:30, we find but few special Acts of Naturalization: such as one in 1762, for the benefit. of Col. Henry Bouquet, and Frederick Victor ; a second, in 1750. for the benefit, of tile solls of De Kalb,-" and a third in 1781, for the benefit of Lafayette' and his male heirs. All of these were to reward services to Maryland.-, Tile Legislature of 1692, the first under the royal government of lta.ryland, passed a general Naturalization Act,7 reciting that "nothing call contribute more to the speed- settling and peopling," of Maryland, `than that