Steiner, Suffrage, 1895,
Image No.: 7
   Enlarge and print image (69K)           << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Steiner, Suffrage, 1895,
Image No.: 7
   Enlarge and print image (69K)           << PREVIOUS  NEXT >>
H CITIZENSHIP AND SUFFRAGE IN MARYLAND. ordaine and command that the said Augustine Herman be in all things held, treated, reputed, and esteemed as one of the fqitlifiill people of vs, our heires and successors, borne within this our Province of Maryland, and likewise, any lands, tenements, revenues, services and other liereditaments whatsoever, within our said Province of Maryland, may hilieritt or otherwise purchase, receive, take, have, hould, buy and possess, and them may occupy and enjoy, give, sell, alien and bequeath, as likewise all liberties, ffra.nchises and 1privi- ledges of this our Province of Maryland, freely, quietly and peaceably have and possess, occupy and enjoy as our faithfull people, borne or to be borne within our said Province of Maryland, without the lett, molestation, vexation, trouble or grievance of vs, our heirs and successors, any custome to the con- trary hereof in any, wise notwithstanding." These letters were given by Lord Baltimore as Palatine, and the extent. of his power is shown by his venturing to give them. We note that according to this, a denizen of Maryland was superior to a denizen of England; in that lie had all rights of natives, instead-of only some of them; in that lie could inherit; and in that he could take grants of land from the proprietor, who Col.- responded to the Crown. Further, he had to pay no alien duty, as a, denizen of England had. The exact difference of his privileges from those of natu- ralized citizens it is not easy to see, and a denizen is known to have served on juries. When the Proprietary sent Col. Utie against New Amstill in Delaware, several persons there were found willing to come under Lord Baltimore's jurisdiction. Some of these removed to Maryland and were the next to obtain patents of denization. These patents follow that of Augustine Herman, save that the causes are stated to be that the petitioners have transported themselves into Maryland and that Lord Baltimore is " willing to give due encouragement to the subjects of that Crowne," and that the petitioner, in each case, is stated to have requested denization, in order to have "freedome, land to him and leis heires to purchase." In case a man has a. family, his wife and children," as well those already borne as those hereafter to be borne," are also made denizens.-' There are in all forty-six patents of deniza,tionrecorded, all but one bein,r given between the years 1661 and 1608. Those made denizens, for the most part, were Swedes, Dutch and French. There are isolated instances of pat- ents issued to inhabitants of Germany, Spain, Portugal, to a Jew and to a Scotchinan. Possibly the latter was an old man and so not affected by tile doctrine of Calvin's case, which declared all born in Scotland, after Jalnes I acceded to the English Crown, to be English citizens. '1 'he last instance of denization, occurring in 1672, is the only instance of a. woman receiving the privilege and is peculiar, in that she had already been included in the letters granted to her father four years before.3 (1) Council I, 529. Herman was one of Commission for Kent, Co. (2) Council I pp. 428-43. (3) Council II, p. 112.