Thomas Stockett Brewer
(1755-1823)
MSA SC 3520-16829
Biography:
Thomas
Stockett Brewer was born in Anne Arundel County, Maryland, around 1753.
Though he had no strong ties to the county and likely could have found
better opportunities for economic success elsewhere, he returned to
Anne Arundel after the war and made Annapolis his permanent home. As he
was a craftsman and not a farmer this was likely a sound move, for
returning to Annapolis gave him access to the town’s industry. It was
not the bustling business center that Baltimore grew into during that
time, but Annapolis did offer developed markets and other resources for
improving his economic situation that the western frontier and
newly-forming towns could not provide to a craftsman.
Chartered
to be Maryland’s capital city in 1708, Annapolis saw a wave of
immigration early in the eighteenth century that brought a large number
of foreign workers to the town. These immigrants, mostly craftsmen,
often came to the colony with their entire families, looking for a new
opportunity in the New World. Annapolis’ population doubled in size
between 1710 and 1730, with most immigrants to the town being laborers
of some kind. This influx of workers helped Annapolis grow into a great
urban center in the mid-eighteenth century, but the rest of Anne
Arundel County followed the same path as most other counties in
Maryland; Anne Arundel was extensively cultivated by landowners for
farms and plantations, and it quickly became the leading
tobacco-producing county in Maryland. Although Annapolis was not
centered on agriculture, the landowners who were profiting off of the
enterprise often worked in the town as merchants, and sharp class
divides existed in the area.[1]
The class distinctions in Anne
Arundel County had more levels than they did in other areas, largely
due to the capital being within the county. While most areas in
Maryland were mostly populated by large and middling planters, poor
folks, and slaves, Anne Arundel was populated by these groups as well
as merchants, politicians, and craftsmen of varying degrees of success.
Other counties had these groups as well, but not to the same magnitude
as Anne Arundel. There was also a striking divide between the two
aspects of the county itself; the rural areas and Annapolis differed
drastically from each other. One big difference between the two was the
presence of slaves, as many existed as laborers on the plantations and
farms, but mainly worked as servants within the town. Most Annapolis
craftsmen relied more on apprentices and indentured servants than
slaves in their shops, and the proportion of the slave population in
town limits remained stable at two whites for every slave throughout
the eighteenth century and beyond, though it fluctuated elsewhere.[2]
Annapolis,
like most of the colonial urban centers, was much more affected by the
Revolutionary movement than the more rural parts of the colony as it
contained a larger, more-condensed population that could be more easily
organized to action than could the spread-out populace in rural areas.
The people’s proximity to their political leaders also led to them
having a more immediate impact on their community than their rural
counterparts. As an economic and political center, the town and its
people felt the oppressive tax laws handed down by Britain quicker and
perhaps with more severity than did others in the colony. It did not
take long for these factors to produce a revolutionary environment in
the capital.
It is unclear where Brewer lived in Anne Arundel
before the Revolution, but his future as a craftsman indicates that he
likely grew up in Annapolis and worked as an apprentice or was
indentured in the years leading up to the war. This being the case, he
would have been surrounded by the revolutionary attitudes in the town.
These attitudes were hard to ignore; upon the passage of the Stamp Act,
the tax collector was burned in effigy and paraded around the town. On
another occasion, a mob tore down the home of a British officer. The
town even mimicked Boston’s rebellion of 1773, with a crowd performing
the Annapolis version of a tea party in 1774. Another revolutionary
action was taken the next year with the passage of the Association of
Freemen, which endorsed armed opposition to the British troops who had
been deployed in Maryland.[3]
These attitudes almost certainly
had a strong effect on the young Brewer, but another issue likely
played a role in his decision to join the Continental Army. In the
decade leading up to the Revolution, Annapolis’ population increased by
over twenty-five percent. This was due in large part to the capital’s
booming economy; business was good in Annapolis, and numerous
merchants, craftsmen, and other workers came to the town to benefit.
Brewer, having likely just completed his apprenticeship or term of
indenture, would have had to deal with a larger population than the
town had ever seen. This was made worse by the fact that a large
portion of this populace was made up of other craftsmen looking for the
same work he was.[4] The lessening prospects of finding work in his
home and the revolutionary environment he grew up in likely were
factors in his enlistment.
Brewer was about twenty-one years old when he entered the military as a
private in captain
Nathaniel
Ramsey's Fifth
Company of First Maryland Regiment, mustering in at Londontowne,
Maryland.[5] He traveled to New York with this regiment and was under
the command of George Washington while there, arriving in the
summer of 1776. On August 27 the regiment fought in the Battle of Long
Island, where they suffered heavy casualties. Although Brewer did not
list the battle in his pension as one he had participated in, he was
enlisted at the time it was fought and his company was at the front
lines when it began, indicating that he took part in the engagement.
Brewer returned to Maryland after fighting at the Battle of White
Plains and in a few more skirmishes later that year, and he reenlisted
after the army was reformed in December of 1776.[6]
Brewer was mustered as a non-commissioned officer into a company
of the Second Maryland Regiment in early 1777, and he fought with this unit at the
Battle of Germantown. They then marched, moving from White Marsh Hills
to Wilmington, Delaware, where they camped for the winter. Brewer
served in this regiment for several years and wintered at a place
called Week's Farm, likely in New York or New Jersey, in 1779. Setting
up a camp on the farm for the cold season, he was injured there—struck
by a falling log—while constructing a hut to be used as soldiers’
quarters. This injury may have hastened his removal from the service,
for the following spring, in 1780, he returned to Annapolis with his
regiment and was discharged from service while there.[7]
Fortunate
enough to be discharged in his home, Brewer chose to remain in
Annapolis and began working as a shoemaker. Because he left the
military as the war was still underway, Brewer was able to celebrate
with the other residents of Annapolis during their celebrations of
Cornwallis’ surrender in 1781 and the agreement of the Treaty of Paris
in 1783, both remembered as grand occasions in the town. Though
Annapolis
had boomed in the years leading up to the Revolution, it was in a
decline following the war. Temporarily chosen to be the capital of the
country, Annapolis was not well-liked by politicians of other states
and was quickly replaced. It also had a powerful new rival in its
neighbor. Baltimore was steadily becoming the center for commerce in
Maryland, and the city had grown to be the fourth largest in the United
States by 1790, behind only New York, Boston, and Philadelphia. A
developing market in Baltimore meant a decline in the industry of
Annapolis, but this decline likely gave Brewer the opportunity that he
did not have before the war. As other craftsmen relocated to the city
with the stronger and more profitable markets, work became available in
Annapolis.[8]
Within a short time of his discharge Brewer
shared a quarter-acre lot in Annapolis worth about $200 with a man
known simply as Welsh. The lot contained a small, somewhat rundown
house, part brick and part frame; this was likely his place of
residence and the location of his shop, and Welsh may have been a
business partner.[9] Despite the downward turn that Annapolis underwent
following the Revolution, the system for craftsmen remained the same as
it had been prior to the war, with a master running the shop and
teaching an apprentice his trade. Brewer, almost certainly having
served under a master to learn his craft, likely became the master in
his own shop.[10]
Although the Revolution had a great impact on
his life, Brewer was influenced by another conflict fought during his
lifetime, the War of 1812. Living on his small lot in Annapolis, he
would have felt the pressure created by the new war and the threat that
the British posed while sailing on the Chesapeake Bay. He and his
family may have been some of the many who fled the city when Annapolis
was threatened by British attack, though many of those who did flee
began returning after the victory at the Battle of Fort McHenry. Brewer
had experienced war during his Revolutionary service, but he had not
encountered a threat to his hometown or his family like he did during
the War of 1812.[11]
After working as a shoemaker on the same
quarter-acre lot for three and a half decades, Brewer eventually
acquired a different lot in Annapolis, near the corner of Duke of
Gloucester and Green streets, which contained a small frame house. He
acquired his new lot in 1817 for $200 down, and he continued to pay
ground rent at about $15 for the property annually.[12] This lot,
approximately 4,000 square feet of land, was likely where he lived out
the remainder of his days with his family. Brewer had married a woman
named Susanna Lampley in Annapolis in 1780, only a few months after he
left the military. They had eight children, Sarah, Eunas, John Mercer,
Mary Ann, Brice Beal, Allen Thomas, Eliza, and Susanna Brewer. The size
of his growing family may have been a factor in the purchase of his new
home.[13]
At the time of his death, Brewer was assessed as
having just over $270 worth of property in his possession. Compared to
a sample of other Annapolis residents, this was not very much. He was
by far in the poorer stratum of his society, falling into the bottom
fifteen percent in terms of total property value. The median estate
value for Annapolis residents who died the same year, 1823, was just
over $730.[14] A large gap in value existed due to the ownership of
slaves; as a craftsman, Brewer owned no slaves, but the presence of
slaves in others’ estates drove their value much higher.
Despite
remaining one of the poor members of his society, Brewer was able to
own far more than he had in the years leading up to the war. There was
nothing for him in Annapolis prior to the Revolution, pushing him into
the Continental service. Spending this time in the service allowed the
town markets to open back up by the time he returned, and he quickly
found work and a place to live. Working for years at his trade, Brewer
eventually made enough money to do things he never could have done
before; he purchased his own property more than once and made deals for
supplies. The fact that he could spend $200 on property was impressive
in itself, but he was also able to spend another $117, this time on
shoemaking supplies, only two years after purchasing the lot.[15]
Making these two large purchases in such close proximity indicates that
he did have success in his life after the war. Brewer was not able to
become one of the wealthiest men in his town, but he was able to
support his family and provide a steady income through his work. He was
granted a pension for his service in 1818, helping with these costs. He
died in his home county in 1823.[16]
Jeffery Truitt, 2014
Notes:
[1] Jane Wilson McWilliams, Annapolis: City on the Severn, a History (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2011), 28-39; Lorena S. Walsh, “Urban Amenities and Rural Sufficiency: Living Standards and Consumer Behavior in the Colonial Chesapeake, 1643-1777,” The Journal of Economic History, Vol. 43, No. 1 (1983): 111-112.[2] McWilliams,
Annapolis, 40-42.
[3] McWilliams, Annapolis, 67, 91.
[4]
McWilliams, Annapolis, 72-80.
[5]
Pension of Thomas Stockett Brewer and Widow’s Pension of Susanna
Brewer, National Archives,
Revolutionary War
Pension and Bounty-Land Warrant Application Files, NARA M804, W 9369,
5, from
Fold3.com.
[6]
Pension of Thomas Brewer, 5, 8.
[7]
Pension of Thomas Brewer, 5-6, 34.
[8]
Pension of Thomas Brewer, 9; McWilliams, Annapolis,
104-117.
[9] General Assembly, House of Delegates, Assessment Record, 1783, Anne Arundel County [MSA S 1161-1-1, 1/4/5/44];
[10]
McWilliams, Annapolis, 118.
[11]
McWilliams, Annapolis, 124-126.
[12]
Anne Arundel County Court, Land Records, Liber WSG 5 1817-1818, 300-301[MSA C97-56,
01/01/07/10].
[13]
Pension of Thomas Brewer, 9, 12, 14.
[14] Anne Arundel County Register of Wills, Inventories, 1820-1823, Liber THH 2, 532
[MSA
C88-15, 01/03/12/040]. The sample of estates was
taken from
the surrounding pages and consisted of Brewer’s and twenty other
residents’. It
included only total property values and no auction sales or debts owed.
[15]
Anne Arundel County Court, Land Records, WSG 6 1818-1820, 483 [MSA C97-57,
01/01/07/11].
Return to Thomas Stockett Brewer's Introductory Page
Tell Us What You Think About the Maryland State Archives Website!
|