Judiciary defended by Rasin
Chief district judge finds comments by O'Malley `offensive'; `We care
about the city'; Panel hears response to mayor's call for major court
reforms
____________________________________________________
By Thomas W. Waldron
Sun Staff
The chief judge of Maryland's District
Court defended her role in efforts to
reform Baltimore's court system, labeling
recent criticism by Mayor Martin O'Malley
as "offensive."
"The implication is that judges don't care
about Baltimore City," a clearly piqued
Judge Martha F. Rasin told a Senate
subcommittee yesterday in Annapolis. "I
take offense at that. We care about the
city as much, if not more than other
people."
Rasin was responding to comments O'Malley has made in Annapolis
and Baltimore in recent weeks questioning the judges' commitment to
major reform.
O'Malley also upset some top judges this week with the release of his
plan to overhaul the city court system -- a plan that included stick
figures designed to show his idea in the simplest of terms.
The mayor is hoping to change the way the beleaguered court system
operates, with the goal to dispose of half of all criminal cases within
24
hours to allow the system to give more attention to the most serious
ones.
In particular, O'Malley has been at odds with Rasin and other top
judges over their reluctance to open a courtroom in the city's central
booking facility up to seven days a week.
But Rasin told the subcommittee that O'Malley's reform plan lacked
important details. For example, she said, the mayor does not define
which cases are "trivial" and worthy of quick resolution.
"If someone breaks into your car, that is not a trivial case to you,"
Rasin said.
Rasin told legislators that it's not the judiciary's place to embrace the
mayor's "zero-tolerance" crime-control efforts. Rather, she said, judges
are charged with giving every defendant a fair hearing in an impartial
setting.
`People's rights'
"I'm worried about people's rights. I'm worried about our integrity,"
Rasin said. "I can't say that I will accept pleas in 50 percent of the
cases.
"We need to find a use for that courtroom so it's not public safety's
courtroom or the mayor's courtroom," Rasin added. "It's the District
Court's courtroom."
After yesterday's three-hour hearing, key legislators said they had little
sympathy for Rasin and other top judges in the state, noting that
O'Malley is simply trying to shake up a system with many problems.
"She has misread the political urgency of this," said Sen. Gloria G.
Lawlah, a Prince George's County Democrat who heads the budget
subcommittee. "We all do some grandstanding, but it's going to take
this to bring these two together."
Sen. Barbara A. Hoffman, chairman of the Senate budget committee
and a strong O'Malley supporter during last year's mayoral election,
concurred.
"Too bad," said Hoffman, a Baltimore Democrat, when told about
Rasin's comments. "We can't have such thin skins. Everybody's at
fault in this one.
"The mayor may have been intemperate, but he was speaking for the
people, who are feeling intemperate," Hoffman said.
The General Assembly has withheld nearly $9 million from the budgets
of the judiciary and other public safety agencies as a way to force
their cooperation in reform efforts in Baltimore.
Restrictions likely
That money may be released in coming weeks, legislators said, but the
Assembly will likely put restrictions on the judiciary's budget for next
year to ensure further cooperation.
Legislators are considering giving all parties involved in court reform
until Sept. 1 to come up with a firm plan for expanding the operation of
the courtroom at the central booking facility.
"I think [the deadline is] a marvelous idea," Rasin said. "I think it needs
to come off dead center."
But O'Malley said studying the issue until September was not
necessary.
"It's more of the same," O'Malley said. "I think there's a greater
urgency than that."
Rasin is not alone in raising questions about O'Malley's plan. LaMont
W. Flanagan, the commissioner of state pretrial detention and services
who oversees the city jail, said he, too, has questions.
Court commissioners
In particular, Flanagan said he worries about a part of the plan that
appears to diminish the role of court commissioners, who often free
defendants on their own recognizance soon after their arrest.
Flanagan said he feared that under the mayor's plan, many defendants
could actually spend more time in jail waiting to see a judge instead of
a commissioner.
In addition, Flanagan pointed out that expanding court hours at the
central booking facility would require increased security and more
state spending.
"I personally perceive the plan as a newborn child that has to be taught
how to walk and talk," Flanagan said.
O'Malley said he had no objection to ironing out the plan's specifics,
as
long as it is done quickly.
"I'm not making light of operational details," the mayor said.
Sun staff writer Caitlin Francke contributed to this article.
Originally published on Mar 1 2000