MARVIN MANDEL, Governor                                      361

DIFFERENTLY BY TWO OR MORE JUDGES; OR

(2) THERE ARE OTHER SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES
RENDERING IT DESIRABLE AND IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST THAT
THE DECISION BE REVIEWED.

REVISOR'S NOTE: This section is Art. 5, §21,
slightly rearranged in form. The new
language in paragraph (1) is intended to
cover an apparent gap in the present law, and
to assist in providing uniformity of
decision, especially with reference to the
District Court. The only other changes made
are in style.

SEC. 12-306. COURT IN WHICH REVIEW SHALL BE SOUGHT.

THE PURPOSE OF §§ 12-307 AND 12-308 IS TO ALLOCATE
APPELLATE JURISDICTION BETWEEN THE COURT OF APPEALS
AND THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS. EXCEPT AS EXPRESSLY
PROVIDED IN THOSE SECTIONS, NOTHING IN THEM CREATES OR
ABROGATES A RIGHT TO APPEAL OR OTHERWISE INVOKE
APPELLATE JURISDICTION GRANTED BY THE LAWS OF THE
STATE.

REVISOR'S NOTE: This section is Art. 5, §5B, as
enacted by Ch. 56, Acts of 1973. The only
changes made are in style.

SEC. 12-307. COURT OF APPEALS.

(A)   IN GENERAL.

THE COURT OF APPEALS HAS:

(1)    JURISDICTION TO REVIEW A CASE OR
PROCEEDING PENDING IN OR DECIDED BY THE COURT OF
SPECIAL APPEALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SUBTITLE 2 OF THIS
TITLE; AND

(2)    EXCLUSIVE APPELLATE JURISDICTION WITH
RESPECT TO A QUESTION OF LAW CERTIFIED TO IT UNDER THE
UNIFORM CERTIFICATION OF QUESTIONS OF LAW ACT.

(B)   JURISDICTION UNTIL JANUARY 1, 1975.

UNTIL JANUARY 1, 1975, THE COURT OF APPEALS ALSO
HAS EXCLUSIVE APPELLATE JURISDICTION TO REVIEW ANY
MATTER NOT WITHIN THE EXCLUSIVE INITIAL JURISDICTION
OF THE COURT OF APPEALS, IF PROVISION FOR APPELLATE
REVIEW IS MADE BY LAW.