Newsletter of
The Maryland State Archives
Vol. 15, No. 19
October 9, 2001
www.mdsa.net
or private, was subject to investigation as long as city residents were committed there at public expense. The jurors seemed to take a special interest in the juvenile facility in Cheltenham in Prince George's County. For about 30 years, beginning in 1925, the investigative results were reported in detail and at length. 

The current Cheltenham Youth Facility originated in 1870 as the House of Reformation and Instruction for Colored Children (Ch. 392, Acts of 1870), a privately run institution that began operations in 1872. In 1937, it became a public facility under state control and was renamed the Cheltenham School for Boys (Ch. 70, Acts of 1937). The school was renamed Boys' Village of Maryland in 1949 (Ch. 692, Acts of 1949) and Cheltenham Youth Facility in 1992 (Ch. 8, Acts of 1992).

Some reports, such as the ones for May 1927 and September 1937, provided a historical background for the House of Reformation. Early patrons included Enoch Pratt who donated 550 acres for the school and Gen. Thomas J. Shryock who served as president of the facility for many years. Over time, seven large brick buildings were constructed, along with a hospital, broom factory, and several farm buildings. The school was designed to educate and train African American boys from throughout the state, who were deemed incorrigible, vicious, or vagrant or lacked proper care and discipline in their homes. 

Did the Cheltenham facility fulfill its purpose? Most Baltimore City grand juries through the 
1940s answered in the negative. They blamed 

(continued on Page 2)
GRAND JURY REPORTS: BALTIMORE CITY (Part II) 
by Pat Melville 

Baltimore City Criminal Court (Grand Jury Reports), 1925-1964, in series C2790 contains findings that resulted from visits to the city jail, state prisons, mental hospitals, and juvenile facilities located in the city and surrounding counties.  Any institution, public


Page 2
The Archivists' Bulldog

The Archivists' Bulldog 
Page 3
GRAND JURY REPORTS
(continued from Page 2)

Institution." Ample evidence had existed for several years. The Child Welfare League of America investigated the school in the early 1930s and found insufficient food and clothing, overcrowded dormitories, inadequately trained teachers, severe punishments, few recreation opportunities, and little vocational training. 

After the state assumed control over the Cheltenham school, the grand juries for several months focused on long standing operational problems, many disclosed as the State Employment Commissioner evaluated staff for inclusion in the state merit system. Record keeping practices were haphazard with many medical and punishment records nonexistent. There was no resident physician, and a practical nurse and "Dr. John", the plumber,  handled first aid. The staff imposed harsh disciplinary measures such as flogging with rubber hoses, solitary confinement, and bread and water diets. In 1938 one supervisor was suspended for hitting two boys with his fists and cracking the skull of another one. In the latter case no one could find a record of the assault or the alleged offense of stealing cigars from the superintendent's office. Riots and escapes occurred regularly. 

On their visits the grand jurors toured the kitchen facilities and usually ate a meal with the boys. Unsatisfactory conditions were found frequently. In 1926, the school bakery was turning out heavy, undercooked loaves of bread. Sometimes the juries were mystified by the situations they observed. In 1929, the "food seemed to be plentiful and wholesome but served by barefooted boys who wore white jackets. The combination seemed incongruous -- and what lesson was to be gleaned from this seems an enigma." Ten years later the boys found the food so unappetizing that they refused to eat during the jury's visit. Ten years after that, the jurors found a poorly equipped kitchen, dishes being washed without soap, open garbage containers,

lack of adherence to menu plans, and dirty refrigeration area. 

In the 1950s, the tenor of the jury reports on the Cheltenham school gradually change to more positive observations. A 1956 jury described the visit to Boys Village as the highlight of its tour of juvenile facilities. Two years later it was called "a place of rehabilitation, superior in all respects to the old Cheltenham School...." Racial integration occurred in 1961 when the programs of Boys Village and Maryland Training School for Boys were reconfigured according to a formula based on physical and mental age. 

RECORD TRANSFERS

TALBOT COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY 
COMMISSIONERS 
    (Assessment List) 1854-1877 [MSA T3357] 
    (Audit Reports) 1914-1952 [MSA T3359] 
    (Ledger) 1849-1890 [MSA T3358] 
    (Levy List) 1842 [MSA T3343] 
    (Minutes) 1893-1895 [MSA T3361] 
    (Miscellaneous Papers) 1888-1955 
        [MSA T3360] 
    (Road Accounts) 1878-1918 [MSA T3344] 
    (Tax Collection Ledger) 1864-1866 
        [MSA T3356] 

WASHINGTON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT 
    (Charters) 1856-1993 [MSA T3284] 
    (Civil Papers) 1986-1987 [MSA T1230] 
    (Commissions) 1896-1926 [MSA T3283] 
    (Coroner's Inquests) 1853-1939 
        [MSA T3285] 
    (Criminal Appeals Docket) 1953-1991 
        [MSA T3334] 
    (Equity Papers) 1973-1982 [MSA T425] 
    (Land Records) 1954-1972 [MSA T441] 

WORCESTER COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT 
    (Jury Papers) 1975-1999 [MSA T3303] 


WAR AND ADMINISTRATION OF AN ESTATE 
by Pat Melville 

Prince George's County Register of Wills (Estate Papers) MSA C2119-47-10 contains documents pertaining to the estate of Charles Hodges who died intestate. Alexander H. Boteler was appointed administrator in 1808. Twenty-one years later Boteler closed the estate by filing an affidavit in lieu of a formal account of his administration. His statement reflects a consequence of the British invasion of Maryland during the War of 1812, that usually is not mentioned in the histories of that conflict. 

Boteler swore "that the estate of his intestate has been finally and fully settled and administered by a distribution of all the assets to his creditors, the receipts for which were destroyed by the British in 1814. That there are no assets belonging to the estate in his hands, nor does he ever expect to receive any, and that to the best of his knowledge and belief the creditors and all others interested in the estate are satisfied and contented." The orphans court accepted the affidavit as a final account.