BALTIMORE CITY CIRCUIT COURT
NO. 2
Equity Docket A, 1923, 32A
[T996-32, 0/62/14/3]
Equity Docket B, 1923, 32B
[T997-32, 3/18/7/26]
BALTIMORE CITY COURT
Cases Instituted, 1923, GCL 54A
[T556-46, 3/34/3/4]
Cases Instituted, 1923, GCL 54B
[T556-47, 3/34/3/5]
Cases Instituted, 1923, GCL 54C
[T556-48, 3/34/3/6]
Cases Instituted, 1923, GCL 54D
[T556-49, 3/34/3/7]
BALTIMORE SUPERIOR COURT
Cases Instituted, 1923, Nos.
1-400 [C1497-103, 2/16/12/40]
Cases Instituted, 1923, Nos.
401-800 [C1497-104, 2/16/12/41]
Cases Instituted, 1923, Nos.
801-1200 [C1497-105, 2/16/12/42]
BALTIMORE CITY COURT OF COMMON
PLEAS
Cases Instituted, 1923, JYC
[T511-70, 3/2/11/25]
BALTIMORE CITY CRIMINAL COURT
Criminal Docket, 1923 [C1849-133,
3/30/4/18]
BALTIMORE CITY CIRCUIT COURT
NO. 2
Equity Docket A, Miscellaneous,
1925, 34A [T996-34, 0/62/14/5]
Equity Docket B, Divorces and
Foreclosures, 1925, 34B [T997-34,
3/18/7/28]
BALTIMORE CITY COURT
Cases Instituted, 1925, GCL 57A
[T556-54, 3/34/3/12]
Cases Instituted, 1925, GCL 57B
[T556-55, 3/34/3/13]
Cases Instituted, 1925, GCL 57C
[T556-56, 3/34/3/14]
BALTIMORE CITY SUPERIOR COURT
Cases Instituted, 1925, Nos.
1-400 [C1497-109, 2/16/12/46]
Cases Instituted, 1925, Nos.
401-800 [C1497-110, 2/16/12/47]
Cases Instituted, 1925, Nos.
801-1200 [C1497-111, 2/16/12/48]
BALTIMORE CITY COURT OF COMMON
PLEAS
Cases Instituted, 1925, JYC
[T511-72, 3/2/11/27]
BALTIMORE CITY CRIMINAL COURT
Criminal Docket, 1925 [C1849-135,
3/30/4/20]
BALTIMORE CITY CIRCUIT COURT
NO. 2
Equity Docket A, Miscellaneous,
1927, 36A [T996-36, 0/62/14/1]
Equity Docket B, Divorces and
Foreclosures, 1927, 36B [T997-36,
3/18/7/30]
BALTIMORE CITY COURT
Cases Instituted, 1927, GCL 60A
[T556-60, 3/34/3/18]
Cases Instituted, 1927, GCL 60B
[T556-61, 3/34/3/19]
Cases Instituted, 1927, GCL 60C
[T556-62, 3/34/3/20]
BALTIMORE CITY SUPERIOR COURT
Cases Instituted, 1927,
1927/01-1927/04 [C1497-114, 2/16/13/3]
Cases Instituted, 1927,
1927/05-1927/08 [C1497-116, 2/16/13/5]
Cases Instituted, 1927,
1927/09-1927/12 [C1497-117, 2/16/13/6]
BALTIMORE CITY COURT OF COMMON
PLEAS
Cases Instituted, 1927, JYC
[T511-74, 3/2/11/29]
BALTIMORE CITY CRIMINAL COURT
Criminal Docket, 1927 [C1849-137,
3/30/4/22]
These dockets were NOT searched (for the same years):
BALTIMORE CITY CIRCUIT COURT
Equity Docket C (Foreclosures)
[T465]
BALTIMORE CITY CIRCUIT COURT
NO. 2
Equity Docket C (Foreclosures)
[T998]
I also did not search police dockets or material relating to the
Juvenile Court, Register of Wills or Orphans Court (within the office
of the Register of Wills). The courts that were not stripped are
less important, but it may be
necessary to look at them eventually for the sake of completeness.
The following information was noted: plaintiff, defendant, first
filing date, lawyers involved (assisting and opposing Davis and or
Evans), charge or subject of the suit (if listed in the docket entry),
verdict, sentence or outcome, page number, case number, location of
docket and case papers, and any other significant or unusual
information that appeared in the docket entry. Some cases have
more information, reflecting a closer review of the case papers.
Information such as court costs, judges' names, and dates other than
first filing were usually not noted.
A note of caution regarding determining which cases were heard by
which judge: It is true that the Chief Judge assigned judges to a
particular court for a given term or year and such assignments do
appear in the Minutes of the Supreme Bench. However, a more
accurate description of this system was that a judge was given a court
that was to be his primary responsibility. Sometimes multiple
judges were assigned to a court, especially if there was a higher than
expected volume of cases. Sometimes this was done on a temporary
basis and so not listed in the minutes. Some judges were assigned
as "judge at large," assisting wherever necessary based on volume of
cases. There may have even been some temporary movement or
rotation by judges who were assigned to a specific court. In
other words, the assignments in the Supreme Bench Minutes should not be
used as an absolute indicator of which judges heard which cases, though
perhaps they may be used as a general indicator. The only
absolute indicator is the item "before" (as in "the case was heard
before Judge ___") in the docket entries.
The information was placed in html files by year and in excel
spreadsheets. Davis and Evans each have their own spreadsheet
covering all years searched and Evans has his own html file.
Cases that specifically noted Evans (not just "Davis & Evans") were
placed in the Evans spreadsheet and html file. Nearly all of the
cases during the period that Davis and Evans were in partnership
together are listed as "Davis & Evans" and it is difficult to tell
whether the case involved one or the other or both. Cases
labelled "Davis & Evans" were placed in the Davis html files and
the Davis spreadsheet. Cases in which Davis and Evans were
mentioned individually by their full names were listed jointly in the
Davis and the Evans htmls and spreadsheets.
Case papers were pulled for all courts except Criminal (Criminal
Papers are at the HF warehouse). They reside in clamshells on a
temporary holding shelf, 1/53/7. If papers were not found (this
happened most often for the Court of Common Pleas), a notation was made
in the spreadsheet.
For at least the years 1928-1929, it may be helpful to search the dockets for references to Evans. This was not done initially as he was not considered a part of the project at the time that they were searched. Evans first shows up in the 1923 Baltimore City Criminal Court docket as taking recognizance for defendants in mid September. He first shows up as an attorney, practicing with Davis, Dec. 8, 1923 in the City and Superior Courts.