Marshall appears in almost 200 federal cases.
Marshall only appears in 6 Maryland Court of Appeals cases:

1.) Bell v. State, 227 Md. 302 (1962)
Prosecution for disturbing the peace. From a judgment of the Criminal Court of Baltimore, Joseph R. Byrnes, J., the defendants appealed. The Court of Appeals, Henderson, J., held that conviction of 'sitin' demonstrators who refused when asked to leave privately owned restaurant which had a policy of not serving Negroes, and who were arrested when owner called police, did not constitute denial of freedom of speech.
Affirmed.
Juanita Jackson Mitchell and Tucker R. Dearing, Baltimore (Thurgood Marshall and Jack Greenberg, New York City, on the brief), for appellants.
Lawrence F. Rodowsky, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Thomas B. Finan, Atty. Gen., Saul A. Harris, State's Atty. and James W. Murphy, Asst. State's Atty., Baltimore, on the brief), for appellee.

2.) State Bd. of Public Welfare v. Myers, 224 Md. 246 (1961)
Action for judgment declaring invalidity of statutes providing for recial segregation in state training school. The Circuit Court, Baltimore City, Charles E. Moylan, J., entered a decree from which defendants appealed. The Court of Appeals, Henderson, J., held that statutes providing for racial segregation in state training schools violated the Fourteenth Amendment.
Decree modified and affirmed.
Robert C. Murphy, Asst. Atty. Gen. (C. Ferdinand Sybert, Atty. Gen., on the brief), for appellants.
George Washington Williams, Baltimore, Md., and C. Maurice Weidemeyer, Annapolis, Md., on the brief, amicus curiae for Maryland Petition Committee, Inc.
Tucker R. Dearing and Juanita Jackson Mitchell, Baltimore (Dearing & Toadvine, Baltimore, Thurgood Marshall and Jack Greenberg, New York City, on the brief), for appellee.

3.) McCready v. Byrd, 195 Md. 131 (1950)
Esther McCready, a minor, by Elizabeth McCready, her next friend and parent, filed a petition for mandamus to require Harry C. Byrd, president, and others, the governing board of the University of Maryland, to consider and act upon petitioner's application for admission to the university's school of nursing. The Baltimore City Court, W. Conwell Smith, J., dismissed petition, and petitioner appealed. The Court of Appeals, Markell, J., held that petitioner was denied the equal protection of the laws and therefore was entitled to a writ of mandamus.
Order reversed and case remanded with directions.
Donald G. Murray, Baltimore, and Thurgood Marshall, New York City (Charles H. Houston, Washington, D. C., and Robert L. Carter, New York City, on the brief), for appellant.
Kenneth C. Proctor, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Hall Hammond, Atty. Gen., on the brief), for appellees.

4.) Hammond v. Lancaster, 194 Md. 462 (1950)
H. Carrington Lancaster and others brought suit against Hall Hammond, Attorney General of the State of Maryland, and others, challenging the constitutionality of the Subversive Activities Act and the emergency act re-enacting section three of the Subversive Activities Act and declaring it an emergency measure, and to enjoin defendants from enforcing any of the provisions of the acts.
The Circuit Court No. 2, of Baltimore City, Joseph Sherbow, J., rendered a decree for the complainants, and the defendants appealed.
The Court of Appeals, Henderson, J., held that questions relating to validity of the Emergency Act were properly before the Court, that the Emergency Act did not violate the referendum amendment, and that none of the complainants had any standing to maintain suit to have certain provisions of the Subversive Activities Act and Emergency Act declared unconstitutional.
Decree reversed and bill dismissed.
See also 71 A.2d 482.
Hall Hammond, Atty. Gen., J. Edgar Harvey, Deputy Atty. Gen., and Frank B. Ober, Baltimore (Thomas N. Biddison, City Solicitor, Leroy W. Preston, Asst. City Solicitor, and Hugo A. Ricciuti, Asst. City Solicitor, Baltimore, on the brief), for appellants.
I. Duke Avnet and Linwood G. Koger, Baltimore (Mitchell A. Dubow, Donald G. Murray, Robert P. McGuinn and Bernard Rosen, Baltimore, on the brief), for appellees.
Frank B. Ober, Baltimore, for John W. Avirett, 2d, et al., former members of the Commission Subversive Activities.
William F. McDonald, Baltimore, and James A. Perrott, Baltimore, on the brief, amici curiae, for Maryland Committee Against Unamerican Activities.
Harold Buchman, Baltimore, on the brief, amici curiae for National Union of Marine Cooks and Stewards, CIO.
David Rein, Washington, D. C., Dallas F. Nicholas, Baltimore, and Robert J. Silberstein, Washington, D. C., on the brief, amici curiae for National Lawyers Guild.
Arnold H. Seixas, New York City, Thurgood Marshall, New York City, and Robert L. Carter, Washington, D. C., on the brief, amici curiae for National Association for Advancement of Colored People.
Jacob J. Edelman and Marshall A. Levin, Baltimore, on the brief, amici curiae for Baltimore Federation of Labor and Baltimore Teachers Union, Local 340.
Eugene M. Feinblatt, Donald N. Rothman, Baltimore, on the brief, amici curiae for Americans for Democratic Action.
Joseph I. Paper and Joseph Burke, Baltimore, on the brief, amici curiae for Md. Civil Liberties Committee, Inc.
Isador B. Terrell, Baltimore, on the brief, amicus curiae for American Assoc. of Social Workers, Md. Chapter.
William H. Murphy, Baltimore, on the brief, amicus curiae for National Council of the Arts, Sciences and Professions.
Lee Pressman, New York City, on the brief, amicus curiae for International Workers Order.
Harold Buchman, Baltimore, James Stewart Martin, Annapolis, and John J. Abt, New York City, on the brief, amici curiae for Progressive Party of Maryland.
Nathan Witt, New York City, amicus curiae for Food, Tobacco, etc. Workers Union, et al.
Hilary W. Gans, Baltimore, on the brief, amicus curiae for John Hopkins University Chap., Amer. Assoc. University Professors.
David Scribner and Basil R. Pollitt, New York City, on the brief, amici curiae for United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of America.
Maurice Braverman, Baltimore, on the brief, amicus curiae for Communist Party of Maryland.
Ely Albert Castleman, Baltimore, on the brief, amicus curiae for Interdenominational Ministerial Alliance.

5.) Williams v. Zimmerman, 172 Md. 563 (1937)
Appeal from Circuit Court, Baltimore County; Frank I. Duncan, Judge.
Mandamus by Margaret Williams, infant, by Joshua B. Williams, Jr., her father and next friend, and Joshua B. Williams, Jr., individually, against David W. Zimmerman, principal of the Catonsville High School, and others. From a judgment dismissing the petition, plaintiffs appeal.
Affirmed.
Thurgood Marshall, of New York City, and Leon A. Ransom, of Washington, D. C. (Charles H. Houston and Edward P. Lovett, both of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for appellants.
William L. Marbury, Jr., and William L. Rawls, both of Baltimore (Cornelius V. Roe, of Towson, on the brief), for appellees.

6.) Pearson v. Murray, 169 Md. 478 (1936)
Appeal from Baltimore City Court; Eugene O'Dunne, Judge.
Mandamus by Donald G. Murray to compel Raymond A. Pearson and others, officers and members of the Board of Regents of the University of Maryland, to admit petitioner as a student in the law school of the university. From an order directing issuance of the writ, respondents appeal.
Order affirmed.
Charles T. LeViness, 3d, and Wm. L. Henderson, Asst. Attys. Gen. (Herbert R. O'Conor, Atty. Gen., on the brief), for appellants.
Thurgood Marshall, of Baltimore, and Charles H. Houston, of Washington, D. C. (William I. Gosnell, of Baltimore, on the brief), for appellee.