Gibson/Papenfuse
Race and the Law in Maryland

Image No: 335   Enlarge and print image (53K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>

clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Gibson/Papenfuse
Race and the Law in Maryland

Image No: 335   Enlarge and print image (53K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>

MARYLAND SLAVE POPULATION 37 able, furthermore, were awarded to English servants, who spoke their master's language, had often acquired a trade before migrating, and ap- peared on the plantations of nearly every slaveowner.20 Seventeenth- century plantation life offered bound laborers few chances for occupational advancement. Given the height of linguistic and cultural barriers and the depth of racial prejudice, unassimilated African slaves could not compete with white indentured servants for the few good jobs that did exist. Plantation work routines did little to alleviate the dreary isolation that slavery forced upon most blacks in the early colonial period. The isolation of blacks may have been mitigated by visiting in the evening, on Sundays and holidays, or by running away. The literature conveys the impression that slaves had more freedom of movement in the seventeenth century than later, but the evidence is not very firm.21 There are complaints of blacks wandering about from plantation to plantation on visits, of "continual concourse of Negroes on Sabboth and holy days meeting in great numbers," and of slaves getting "Drunke on the Lords Day beating their Negro Drums by which they call considerable Numbers of Negroes together in some Certaine places." According to Gov. Francis Nicholson, visiting, even at distances of thirty or forty miles, was "common practice."22 Yet it is impossible to determine, even crudely, how many blacks were able to make social contacts \vith slaves from other plantations or how frequently such contacts occurred. The wide dispersal of ownership, and in particular the unbalanced sex ratio on most plantations, must have driven blacks to exploit whatever chances circumstances." Nicholson to the Board of Trade, Aug. 20, 1698, Md. Arch., XXIII, 499. Nicholson is usually a reliable witness, but this assertion is clearly an exaggera- tion. 20 For servants' skills see Mildred Campbell, "Social Origins of Some Early Americans," in James Morton Smith, ed., Seventeenth-Century America: Essays in Colonial History (Chapel Hill, N. C., 1959), 71. Their presence on the estates of most slaveowners is apparent in the inventories. 21 At least this is the impression conveyed if it is assumed that legislation and case law provide a rough guide to the actual status and privileges of blacks. Despite their disagreements, the participants in the debate over the origins of slavery and race prejudice agree that the law of slavery tended toward increased severity during ihe late I7th and early i8th centuries. Winthrop D. Jordan, White Over Blac^: American Attitudes Toward the Negro, 7550-75/2 (Chapel Hill, N. C., 1968), 71-83; Carl N. Degler, "Slavery and the Genesis of American Race Prejudice," Comparative Studies in Society and History, II (1959-1960), 49-66; Oscar and Mary F. Handlin, "Origins of the Southern Labor System," WMO, 3d Ser., VII (1950), 199-222. --Md. Arch., XXXVIII, 48; Somerset County Judicials, 1707-1711, r, Hall of Records; Nicholson to the Board of Trade, Aug. 20, 1698, Md. Arch., XXIII, 498.