Gibson/Papenfuse
Race and the Law in Maryland

Image No: 229   Enlarge and print image (45K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>

clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Gibson/Papenfuse
Race and the Law in Maryland

Image No: 229   Enlarge and print image (45K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>

educational opportunity to black children." On the other hand, black board member Barbara Martin voted against the plan. The only other black member of the board, Sarah Johnson, voted for the plan, but with serious reservations over the increase in compensatory schools. "This is a plan that segregates rather than integrates," she was quoted as saying. Washington Post, March 14, 1986, p. Bl. 201. Vaughns v. Board of Education of Prince George's County, 742 F. Supp. 1275 (D. Md. 1990). 202. . Id at 1291. 203. Id at 1292. 204. For example, regarding an attempt to prove just this in Maryland, the Court of Appeals wrote: [T]he plaintiffs' efforts to distinguish Rodriguez must also fail in light of the recent line of Supreme Court decisions establishing purposeful discrimination as a requirement for a successful federal equal protection challenge.... The principle of these cases ... is that a "discriminatory purpose" implies more than intent as volition or intent as awareness of consequences; rather it implies that the decision maker (a state legislature) selected or reaffirmed a particular course of action at least in part "because of," and not merely "in spite of," its adverse effects upon an identifiable group. In the present case, not only was there no finding of purposeful discrimination, but there was not even an allegation of such an invidious motive. Hombeck v. Somerset Co. Bd. of Educ., 295 Md. 597 (1983). 205. 411 U.S. 1(1973). 206. 295 Md. 597 (1983). Judge Cole dissented at 659. The decision of the Court of Appeals reversed the decision of Judge Ross of the Circuit Court for Baltimore City. 207. "Desegregating Maryland's Colleges: It Won't Be Simple," Washington Post, April 7, 1969 p. Cl. 208. "State, U.S. to Air Integration Bid," Baltimore Sun, July 8, 1969. 209. 356 F. Supp. 92 (D.D.C. 1972). 210. 411 F. Supp. 542 (D. Md. 1976). 211. Mandel v. U.S. Dept. of Health, Ed. and Welfare, 411 F. Supp. 542, 551-3 (D. Md. 1976). On appeal, the Fourth Circuit initially issued an opinion modifying the decision of the 227