Gibson/Papenfuse
Race and the Law in Maryland

Image No: 119   Enlarge and print image (54K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>

clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Gibson/Papenfuse
Race and the Law in Maryland

Image No: 119   Enlarge and print image (54K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>

The young men have been asked to withdraw. Their examination showed that they were not intellectually qualified to pursue the study of law and receive diplomas as graduates in law, and they have been told that they were simply wasting time and money in attending our lectures. This is our view of the situation aside from the race question. In 1889 we graduated two colored men, Cummings and Johnson, both of whom are now practicing in the city. They were able students and passed good examinations. We treat a colored student as we do a white one, and if he has no aptitude for the law we simply tell him we cannot take his money, as he will receive, of course, no equivalent for it.65 Hawkins reply was quick in coming: It is bad enough to have the University of Maryland take our money, start us on our course, and then suddenly stop us for no other reason than that the white students do not desire to mingle with us, but to have one of the officers misrepresent us in this way is provoking in the extreme. As to Mr. Dozier I have nothing to say; he is fully capable of taking care of himself: For my part I know that what this prominent jurist says is all moonshine. I maintained the university's required standing in every subject but one, and in that I failed by a slight margin. This is no more than some of the best students in the school do. All the university requires is that you make an average of 75 under each professor before it will graduate you. If you do not reach the average the first year, you have the second and third years in which you may do it. One of the white students in my class last year failed in everything; he is going back to the university and in due time will graduate. Nothing is said of his inability to learn the law. One of the most brilliant men in the class of '90 failed the year before several studies. Now, I failed in but one, and that one a subject which is considered by many of the most difficult and technical in the law—real property—yet this "prominent jurist" does not hesitate to show his lack of that element which every jurist should possess—a sense of justice. He says further "they have been told that they were simply wasting time and money in attending our lectures." This that jurist must know is not true, for we have been told no such thing. Last February after our first examination would have been the proper time, if any, to tell us this, but we were not told so, and the 117