?age 466.	aider Paring & 0ontracting Company,  upon their alternative bid of
«*. J _JI         ,_	$57,290.60, on bituminous macadam at $1.28, prDrifted an arrangeme* Chairman & Chief Sngineer
authorized to  let contraotoan be made with said Contractor on their bid. which will be satis-for improving York Hoed
from lyman Avenue to  Tow-   factory to the Chairman and the Chief Engineer, and that if this son to Blder Paving & Con-
traoting Co.,  which was     oannot be done,  the oontraet be awarded to the MoGuire Construction done.	fl
,y,	Company, of Norfolk. 7a., on their bid of $31,847,95 on concrete. (This contract was given to the aider Paving & Contracting Company on their bid.)
Upon motion of Mr.   Ramsay,  seconded by Dr. Clark,   the bid of the
GuiJ^cSSstruotion0^1110"      MoCulre Construction Company,  of Norfolk,  Va.t  for improving the
for improving the road        road running ft.Om east of the boundary line of  the District of
running from east of the
triot'of Columbia*?8 MS~ Colunrt)ia'   to Meadows,  in Prince George's County, a distance of 4.71 Meadows. .,/_.	miles,  being our Contract #0132, amounting to $46,636,38, was accepted.
Upon motion of Mr.  Go si in,  seconded by Mr.  Ramsay,   the bid of
Acceptance of bid of LTO-     the MoG uire Construction Company,  of Norfolk,  Ya.,  for Improving the Guire Construction Company,
for  improving the road         road from near T.    B.  In Prince George's County,   to Mattawoman,   at the from  T.  3.   t«^Mattawoman.
Charles County line, a distance of 3.59 miles,  being our Contract #0135,
for the sum of    $43,188.91, was accepted.
Upon motion of Mr. Miller,   seconded by Mr.  Ramsay,  the bid of
Acceptance of bid of Alien the Alien   Engineering & Contracting Company,  of Hewark, Del.,  of
Sngineering & Contracting
Co.,   for building the road $47,506.95,  for building the road in Cecil County,  from Blkton to
from Slkton  to  Chesapeake
City.        , j,	Chesapeake    City,  a distance of 4,6 miles, being our Contract #044,
was accepted.
Upon motion of Dr.  Clark,   seconded by Mr.  Goslln,  the bid of
Acceptance of Lid of	Arthur & Boyle,  of   12423.25,  for building the 25 foot span bridge
Arthur Cc Boyle  for buil:i-
ing bridge over Tuscarora    over    Tuscarora    Creek,  on the Emmittsburg Pike,   in Frederick County,
Creek. 0°
Rejection of bid of Juniata Paving Co.  for improving roa,;  from Mo-chanicsvillo to  Oaks.
being our    Contract #00241, was accepted, as recommended by Chief Engineer Shirley,   in his letter of March 3rd,   1913.
Upon motion of Mr. Miller, seconied by Mr.  Ramsay,   the bid of the  Juniata    Paving Company,  of $37,608.86,  for improving the road running from Mechanicsvilie to oaks,  in St. Mary's County,  a distance of 5 miles, being our Contract #023, was rejected, as recommended by Chief Engineer      Shirley,   in his letter of March 3rd,  1913,  because the bid was excessive, and the work was ordered readvertised.
Upon motion of Mr. Miller,  seconded by Mr.  Ramsay, the  bid of ; Mohler & Company,  of $27,876.48,  for Improving the road from Cedar Grove toward Damascus,   in Montgomery County, a distance of 2.12
Rejection of bid of Irving irving Mohler & Company,  of $27,876.48,  for Improving the road from MohlerfcCompany,   for improving road from Cedar Grove  toward Damascus.
miles» being our Contract #0236, was rejected,  and the work ordered
Rejection of bid of v7.  C. Ivans for Improving road from the Frederick & Howard Cjunty lines toward Damascus.
readvertised, as recommended by Chief Bngi» er Shirley,  in his letter of March 3rd,  1913.
Upon motion of Mr. Miller,   seconded by Mr.  Ramsay,  the bid of W. C. Bvans,  of Ambler,  Pa.',  of $29,655.90,   for improving the road from the Frederick and Howard County lines toward Damascus,  a distance of 2 miles, being our Contract #0237, was rejected,  and the work ordered readrertieed, as recommended by Chief Bngineer Shirley,  in his letter of March 3rd,  1913.