458 MARYLAND HISTORICAL MAGAZINE documents of title were in evidence—Alexander Mountney's original patent from 1663 and a deed from Samuel and Ann Wheeler to David Jones in 1685. These indicia of ownership, however, were unconnected to Blunt. In the final analysis the strength of Todd's tide to Mountney's Neck was that he took possession, and no successors in interest to Mountney or Jones were forthcoming.22 The patent to Bold Venture was of then-recent origin. Its one hundred sixty acres were in the shape of a boot, with the legging slipped in between Mountney's Neck and Cole's Harbour and the foot submerged beneath the waters of the Northwest Branch. It had been granted to John Oulton in 1695 and, as was often the case, its boundaries overlapped those of its neighbors. Mountney's Neck was originally described as having a width of one hundred perches, but apparently the surveyor laid out a tract with a width of one hundred forty perches. With the legging of Bold Venture the surveyor purported to reclaim this "surplusage" for Oulton, and then some.23 Todd's claim to Bold Venture was at best dubious. The historical record indicates that Captain John Oulton was still very much alive and still interested in the patent; in 1707 he would obtain a warrant of resurvey for the tract. No evidence has been found to link Oulton to James Todd.24 By 1701 James Todd had pretensions to nine-hundred-odd acres of land lying to the north of the harbor basin. The patents he may or may not have consolidated are roughly plotted in Map 2. Todd immediately began to sunder that which he had brought together. In March of that year he transferred approximately three hundred acres to John Hurst. The parcel was said to consist of one hundred thirty-five and one-half acres of Cole's Harbour which lay to die east of die Jones Falls plus a waterfront pordon of Mountney's Neck estimated at one hundred sixty-four and one-half acres. The deed to Hurst carved his parcel by metes and bounds out of Cole's Harbour and Mountney's Neck widiout reference to Bold Venture. In June 1701 James Todd transferred the residue of Todd's Range, Mountney's Neck, and all of Bold Venture to Charles Carroll. Since die Hurst claim was prior and more explicit, Carroll presumably had no rights in the fast land portions of Bold Venture waterfront; Carroll's Bold Venture rights if any were in the sub- merged pordon.25 This division, which laid the groundwork for die subsequent parceling out of eighteendi-century Baltimore, is depicted in Map 3. Carroll's portion of Todd's Range was destined to become the location of Baltimore Town and die Hurst tract to become die site of Jones Town, commonly called Old Town. Charles Carroll the Settler. Charles Carroll, an Irish Catiiolic gentleman, had come to Maryland in 1688 to serve as die proprietor's attorney general. In 1689, soon after his arrival in Maryland, he lost his job and political rights to the Protestant government. Thereafter he devoted his considerable energies and ambitions to getting rich as a land speculator. In tiiese speculations he was probably aided by his father-in-law, Henry Darnall, who operated Lord Baltimore's land office. Darnall himself had been richly rewarded over die years with eighteen thousand acres of Maryland land.26 I Parceling Out Land 459 1701. Map 2: Contiguous tracts claimed by James Todd in Charles Carroll the Settier showed vision in his selection of die parcel he bought from Todd—over the next century it would become a shipping and manufacturing center—but in die short term the holding produced litde, if any, return on the investment. In 1711 Carroll did manage to sell thirty-one acres to Jonathan Hanson, who built a strong dam across die falls and put up a substantial mill that came to be called Hanson's Improvement. Other than Hanson die only inhabitant on die lands on the west bank appears to have been Carroll's overseer, John Flemming, who, farther to die west, lived on and cultivated a quarter section of tobacco until about 1718.27 Hanson's Improvement and Flemming's homestead are indicated on Map 3. Carroll die Settler continued to speculate in Maryland land. In diis he was immeasurably aided when, in 1712, he succeeded his deceased fatiier-in-law as die Lord Proprietor's land agent. That same year Charles Calvert, still residing in England, sent Carroll instructions ordering him to crack down on die speculation in warrants and other practices which deprived the proprietor of his revenues. Reports are diat nothing happened.28 Charles Carroll of Annapolis. Charles Carroll the Settler died in 1720, leaving a wife and four children: Charles Carroll of Annapolis (his legal heir), two daughters, and another son, Daniel Carroll. The Setder's estate was approximately ninety thousand pounds sterling and included sixty tiiousand acres of land which passed to die brothers as tenants in common. Among die landholdings was die claim to the approximately five hundred acres on die nordi shore of the Patapsco Basin. In 1723 Charles Carroll of Annapolis attained majority and assumed control of the