Readings ecp_10_289_290, Image No: gould_ecp_26_55-0013   Enlarge and print image (101K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
clear space clear space clear space white space


 

Readings ecp_10_289_290, Image No: gould_ecp_26_55-0013   Enlarge and print image (101K)            << PREVIOUS   NEXT >>
248 ESSAYS IN COLONIAL HISTORY bacco exports were static and betray no effect of the ris- ing importance of Baltimore. Trade to Ireland, which was mostly grain, shows a marked increase. During the first five years of the period there was an average of less than 3 ships a year depart- ing for that island. No significant change in these ship- ments is recorded until 1769, when a rapid growth set in culminating in 42 Irish departures in 1770, and averaging nearly 25 for the last five-year period. The only other transatlantic trade was the shipment of grain to southern Europe, mostly Spain and Portugal and their islands in European waters. During the first six years of the period 1757-1773 there were only four departures for this re- gion. But beginning with 8 ships in 1763 this trade jumped to 35 in 1769, and averaged nearly 28 from 1769 to 1773. The West India trade (including that to the Bahamas, but not that to Bermuda) ran about 12 departures a year during the first five years of the period, but after 1761 it rose irregularly to its maximum of 46 in 1773. The aver- age for the last five years was over 32." The contrast of the static condition of the tobacco trade and the rapid growth of the trade to grain consuming areas is marked. Undoubtedly the tobacco trade represents chiefly those parts of the customs district outside of Baltimore, and in all probability the grain increase is mostly due to the rising trade of the new city.98 «" It must be remembered that the number of departures does not fur- nish a basis for comparing the volume of trade between the several trading areas. The West India ships, for instance, were very much smaller than those in the British trade. «9 The Annapolis port books down to 1766 include sailings from the Chester River subdistrict. Many of these can be distinguished by the place in which bond was given or by the entry of well known Chester River mer- chants as owners. After 1766 Chester River sailings are listed separately. An effort has been made to omit Chester River vessels from all these figures, but before 1766 errors from this source are inevitable. I I THE EISE OF BALTIMORE 249 Departures for the other colonies of continental Amer- ica show a gradual shift southward. The period opens with a large trade to the ports between Cape Henlopen and Massachusetts. The first five-year period shows an average of nearly 17 ships a year to this region, but dur- ing the last five years this average rises to only 21. To the south, however, an average of about 7 for the early period mounted to 22 in the later. The volume of trade to the northward was, without doubt, greater than that to the southward, for many ships to the south, especially those to Virginia, went in ballast. It seems probable that when Maryland began to export her own grain on a large scale, there was less opportunity for northern ships to pick up ladings; while the Baltimore shippers in quest of cargoes to England began to exploit the southern crop markets. The industries of Baltimore were only those that are naturally subservient to these trades. Shipbuilding, dis- tilling, baking for export, and particularly milling were the most important. There was an iron industry in the immediate neighborhood; but since Maryland iron was usually sold directly to ship captains to ballast the bulky tobacco cargoes, this was probably of small importance to the town. But it is not the purpose of this paper to present a full analysis of the trade and industry of the city, though these were the basis of its remarkable growth. In 1744 Baltimore was a scattered group of houses with a rival, Jones Town, just across Jones' Falls. Probably in that year was opened the road to the frontier, the results of which were soon evident. In 1745, in accordance with a petition of the inhabitants of both towns, the two were united under the name of the larger.70 This merger left the boundary very irregular with a strip of land along TO Records of Baltimore Town, p. rvii; Bacon, Law», 1745, ch. ix.